After embryo production, the couple could be separated or the partner could have changed his mind on the use of excessive embryos or lost the desire to transfer them. This makes no legal difference, a man has the right to deny his consent to reproduction up to the moment of fertilisation: straight after fertilisation, the man loses all rights on embryo reproduction to the woman. The 40/2004 law on assisted reproduction gives the woman this right regardless of whether her partner gave his genetic material for fertilisation, whether the frozen embryo was produced with the gametes of a donor or with that of her partner: in both cases, the woman has the right to decide alone and, if so, even against her partner's wish to try and have a child from the embryo. We will examine whether it is right to give the woman exclusive embryo rights. Our conclusion will be that there are no truly convincing reasons to leave to the woman alone the right to decide on in vitro produced embryos, in that the birth of an unwanted child can cause damage to the health of women as well as men. We are though aware of the importance that in vitro and possibly cryoconserved embryos may have for one who years before launched an assisted reproduction path. For this reason, we think that the law should recall that even significant changes occurring recently in the field of reproduction and foresee the man's possibility of agreeing to his partner's possible request to for embryo transfer, without being obliged to recognise the son and cover maintenance fees.
È giusto che le donne abbiano l'ultima parola sugli embrioni in vitro
Maurizio Balistreri
2019-01-01
Abstract
After embryo production, the couple could be separated or the partner could have changed his mind on the use of excessive embryos or lost the desire to transfer them. This makes no legal difference, a man has the right to deny his consent to reproduction up to the moment of fertilisation: straight after fertilisation, the man loses all rights on embryo reproduction to the woman. The 40/2004 law on assisted reproduction gives the woman this right regardless of whether her partner gave his genetic material for fertilisation, whether the frozen embryo was produced with the gametes of a donor or with that of her partner: in both cases, the woman has the right to decide alone and, if so, even against her partner's wish to try and have a child from the embryo. We will examine whether it is right to give the woman exclusive embryo rights. Our conclusion will be that there are no truly convincing reasons to leave to the woman alone the right to decide on in vitro produced embryos, in that the birth of an unwanted child can cause damage to the health of women as well as men. We are though aware of the importance that in vitro and possibly cryoconserved embryos may have for one who years before launched an assisted reproduction path. For this reason, we think that the law should recall that even significant changes occurring recently in the field of reproduction and foresee the man's possibility of agreeing to his partner's possible request to for embryo transfer, without being obliged to recognise the son and cover maintenance fees.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
È GIUSTO CHE LE DONNE ABBIANO L’ULTIMA PAROLA SUGLI EMBRIONI IN VITRO? _Balistreri.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
135.79 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
135.79 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.