We provide a methodology for eliciting utility midpoints from pref- erences, assuming that payoffs are consumption plans and that preferences satisfy a minimal form of additive separability. The methodology does not re- quire any subjective or objective uncertainty. Thus, this construction of utility midpoints allows us to define mixtures of acts in a purely subjective fashion, without making any assumptions as to the decision maker’s reaction to the uncertainty that may be present. This approach makes it possible to provide a simple and fully subjective characterization of the second-order subjective ex- pected utility model, allowing a clear distinction of such model from subjective expected utility.

Randomizing without Randomness

Paolo Ghirardato
;
Daniele Pennesi
2023-01-01

Abstract

We provide a methodology for eliciting utility midpoints from pref- erences, assuming that payoffs are consumption plans and that preferences satisfy a minimal form of additive separability. The methodology does not re- quire any subjective or objective uncertainty. Thus, this construction of utility midpoints allows us to define mixtures of acts in a purely subjective fashion, without making any assumptions as to the decision maker’s reaction to the uncertainty that may be present. This approach makes it possible to provide a simple and fully subjective characterization of the second-order subjective ex- pected utility model, allowing a clear distinction of such model from subjective expected utility.
2023
1
32
Subjective Mixture Space · Ambiguity · Second-Order Subjective Expected Utility
Paolo Ghirardato; Daniele Pennesi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
randomizing.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 676.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
676.47 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1727457
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact