In the national legal systems of various European countries, the repression of tax law offences is characterized by the coexistence of administrative and criminal proceedings which may lead to the infliction of multiple penalties. This configuration is nowadays questioned by the latest European Courts case law’s developments concerning the ne bis in idem principle, which require procedural coordination between the different proceedings in order to avoid overly repressive or disproportionate consequences. This essay analyses the penalty systems adopted by the Italian and French legal orders, focusing on potential frictions between these two systems and the abovementioned fundamental guarantee enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in the light of some recent judgments delivered by both the Italian Constitutional Court and the French Conseil Constitutionnel. This paper aims to demonstrate that, within the current Italian and French legal orders, the criteria for assessing violations of the ne bis in idem principle are vague, with the result that wide discretion is given to judges in interpreting and applying national rules, which provide administrative and criminal proceedings, and penalties, in relation to tax law offences.

Sul doppio binario punitivo in materia tributaria. Ne bis in idem, coordinamento procedimentale e proporzionalità del cumulo sanzionatorio.

Ruggero Rudoni
2019-01-01

Abstract

In the national legal systems of various European countries, the repression of tax law offences is characterized by the coexistence of administrative and criminal proceedings which may lead to the infliction of multiple penalties. This configuration is nowadays questioned by the latest European Courts case law’s developments concerning the ne bis in idem principle, which require procedural coordination between the different proceedings in order to avoid overly repressive or disproportionate consequences. This essay analyses the penalty systems adopted by the Italian and French legal orders, focusing on potential frictions between these two systems and the abovementioned fundamental guarantee enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in the light of some recent judgments delivered by both the Italian Constitutional Court and the French Conseil Constitutionnel. This paper aims to demonstrate that, within the current Italian and French legal orders, the criteria for assessing violations of the ne bis in idem principle are vague, with the result that wide discretion is given to judges in interpreting and applying national rules, which provide administrative and criminal proceedings, and penalties, in relation to tax law offences.
2019
4
1015
1048
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.17394/95738
Ne bis in idem principle; criminal matter; tax penalties; European Court of Human Rights; Court of Justice of the European Union; Constitutional Courts
Ruggero Rudoni
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019_DPCE_Sul doppio binario.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 417.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
417.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1728546
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact