Background: V600EBRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a subtype (10%) with overall poor prognosis, but the clinical experience suggests a great heterogeneity in survival. It is still unexplored the real distribution of traditional and innovative biomarkers among V600EBRAF mutated mCRC and which is their role in the improvement of clinical prediction of survival outcomes. Methods: Data and tissue specimens from 155 V600EBRAF mutated mCRC patients treated at eight Italian Units of Oncology were collected. Specimens were analysed by means of immunohistochemistry profiling performed on tissue microarrays. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: CDX2 loss conferred worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.03–2.86, p = 0.036), as well as high CK7 expression (HR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.10–4.29, p = 0.026). According to Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), CMS1 patients had better OS compared to CMS2-3/CMS4 (HR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.19–0.71, p = 0.003). Samples showing less TILs had worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.16–2.56, p = 0.007). Progression-free survival analyses led to similar results. At multivariate analysis, CK7 and CMS subgrouping retained their significant correlation with OS. Conclusion: The present study provides new evidence on how several well-established biomarkers perform in a homogenousV600EBRAF mutated mCRC population, with important and independent information added to standard clinical prognosticators. These data could be useful to inform further translational research, for patients’ stratification in clinical trials and in routine clinical practice to better estimate patients’ prognosis.

CK7 and consensus molecular subtypes as major prognosticators in V600E BRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer

Zichi C.;Di Maio M.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: V600EBRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a subtype (10%) with overall poor prognosis, but the clinical experience suggests a great heterogeneity in survival. It is still unexplored the real distribution of traditional and innovative biomarkers among V600EBRAF mutated mCRC and which is their role in the improvement of clinical prediction of survival outcomes. Methods: Data and tissue specimens from 155 V600EBRAF mutated mCRC patients treated at eight Italian Units of Oncology were collected. Specimens were analysed by means of immunohistochemistry profiling performed on tissue microarrays. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: CDX2 loss conferred worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.03–2.86, p = 0.036), as well as high CK7 expression (HR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.10–4.29, p = 0.026). According to Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), CMS1 patients had better OS compared to CMS2-3/CMS4 (HR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.19–0.71, p = 0.003). Samples showing less TILs had worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.16–2.56, p = 0.007). Progression-free survival analyses led to similar results. At multivariate analysis, CK7 and CMS subgrouping retained their significant correlation with OS. Conclusion: The present study provides new evidence on how several well-established biomarkers perform in a homogenousV600EBRAF mutated mCRC population, with important and independent information added to standard clinical prognosticators. These data could be useful to inform further translational research, for patients’ stratification in clinical trials and in routine clinical practice to better estimate patients’ prognosis.
2019
121
7
593
599
http://www.nature.com/bjc/index.html
Loupakis F.; Biason P.; Prete A.A.; Cremolini C.; Pietrantonio F.; Pella N.; Dell'Aquila E.; Sperti E.; Zichi C.; Intini R.; Dadduzio V.; Schirripa M....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BRAF_BeCool_Transl_14Jan_FL preprint.docx

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 527.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
527.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
BRAF_BeCool_Transl_14Jan_FL preprint.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 473.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
473.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
s41416-019-0560-0.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 388.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
388.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1729969
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact