Purpose: We compared our historical medium-term data obtained with an active semi-implanted bone conduction device and the hearing results of a new passive bone conduction hearing device to determine its predictive value for the hearing results with the semi-implanted device. Methods: The study sample was 15 patients with an active bone conduction implant (mean follow-up 26 months). Pure tone audiometry was performed with headphones, sound field speech audiometry was conducted unaided, and free-field speech audiometry was carried out with both the active bone conduction system and the passive device switched off. Results: As compared with the unaided condition, speech reception was significantly improved with both devices. Comparison of speech reception threshold at 100% of word recognition showed no difference between the active and the passive device. At lower intensity the difference in speech perception was significant in the patients with monaural fitting (group A) and was non-statistically significant in those with binaural fitting (group B); the speech reception threshold at 50% of word recognition was 26.00 dB (± 10.22) with the active implant and 30.50 dB (± 7.98) with the passive device in group A (p = 0.047) and 24.00 dB (± 5.48) and 29.00 dB (± 2.24) in group B (p = 0.052), respectively. Conclusions: The hearing outcome after active bone conduction implant was comparable to published data. Compared with the unaided condition, speech recognition was significantly improved with the passive device. The device may also provide value to predict the hearing outcome with the implanted device, especially at higher intensities. Level of evidence: IV.

A new bone conduction hearing aid to predict hearing outcome with an active implanted device

Canale A.
First
;
Boggio V.;Albera A.;Ravera M.;Caranzano F.;Lacilla M.;Albera R.
Last
2019-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: We compared our historical medium-term data obtained with an active semi-implanted bone conduction device and the hearing results of a new passive bone conduction hearing device to determine its predictive value for the hearing results with the semi-implanted device. Methods: The study sample was 15 patients with an active bone conduction implant (mean follow-up 26 months). Pure tone audiometry was performed with headphones, sound field speech audiometry was conducted unaided, and free-field speech audiometry was carried out with both the active bone conduction system and the passive device switched off. Results: As compared with the unaided condition, speech reception was significantly improved with both devices. Comparison of speech reception threshold at 100% of word recognition showed no difference between the active and the passive device. At lower intensity the difference in speech perception was significant in the patients with monaural fitting (group A) and was non-statistically significant in those with binaural fitting (group B); the speech reception threshold at 50% of word recognition was 26.00 dB (± 10.22) with the active implant and 30.50 dB (± 7.98) with the passive device in group A (p = 0.047) and 24.00 dB (± 5.48) and 29.00 dB (± 2.24) in group B (p = 0.052), respectively. Conclusions: The hearing outcome after active bone conduction implant was comparable to published data. Compared with the unaided condition, speech recognition was significantly improved with the passive device. The device may also provide value to predict the hearing outcome with the implanted device, especially at higher intensities. Level of evidence: IV.
2019
276
8
2165
2170
link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00405/index.htm
Bone conduction implant; Hearing rehabilitation; Predictor of hearing outcome; Speech reception; Adult; Audiometry, Speech; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Implantation; Speech Perception; Bone Conduction; Hearing Aids; Hearing Loss, Conductive; Quality of Life
Canale A.; Boggio V.; Albera A.; Ravera M.; Caranzano F.; Lacilla M.; Albera R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Canale2019_Article_ANewBoneConductionHearingAidTo.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 608.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
608.43 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
A new bone conduction.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 593.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
593.77 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1730607
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact