Objectives In patients at low clinical probability of acute aortic syndromes (AASs), decision on advanced aortic imaging is cumbersome. Integration of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD‐RS) with D‐dimer (DD) provides a potential pipeline for standardized diagnostic rule‐out. We systematically reviewed and summarized supporting data. Methods Cross‐sectional studies assessing integration of ADD‐RS with DD for diagnosis of AASs were identified on MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web Of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed quality, and extracted data. The quality of design and reporting was evaluated with the QUADAS‐2 and STARD tools. Individual patient data were obtained, to allow analysis of both conventional (500 ng/mL) and age‐adjusted (DDage‐adj) DD cutoffs. Data were summarized for four diagnostic strategies combining ADD‐RS = 0 or ≤ 1, with DD < 500 ng/mL or < DDage‐adj. The statistical heterogeneity of the diagnostic variables was estimated with Higgins’ I2. Pooled values were calculated for variables showing nonsignificant heterogeneity. Results After screening of 680 studies, four articles (including a total of 3,804 patients) met inclusion criteria. One prospective study provided a low risk of bias/applicability concerns, while methodologic limitations were found in the other three retrospective studies. Statistical heterogeneity was negligible for sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR) values and significant for specificity and positive LR values of all diagnostic strategies. Pooled sensitivity was 99.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 99.3% to 100%, I2 = 0) for ADD‐RS = 0 and DD < 500 ng/mL or < DDage‐adj, 98.9% (95% CI = 97.9% to 99.9%, I2 = 0) for ADD‐RS ≤ 1 and DD < 500 ng/mL, and 97.6% (95% CI = 96.3% to 98.9%, I2 = 0) for ADD‐RS ≤ 1 and DD < DDage‐adj. Conclusions Despite methodologic limitations, integration of ADD‐RS = 0 or ≤ 1 with DD < 500 ng/mL shows negligible heterogeneity and consistently high sensitivity across studies, thus supporting reliability for diagnostic rule‐out of AASs. Data supporting ADD‐RS = 0 plus DDage‐adj appear preliminary and require further scrutiny.

Systematic review of aortic dissection detection risk score plus D-dimer for diagnostic rule-out of suspected acute aortic syndromes

Bima, Paolo;Pivetta, Emanuele;Lupia, Enrico;Morello, Fulvio
2020-01-01

Abstract

Objectives In patients at low clinical probability of acute aortic syndromes (AASs), decision on advanced aortic imaging is cumbersome. Integration of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD‐RS) with D‐dimer (DD) provides a potential pipeline for standardized diagnostic rule‐out. We systematically reviewed and summarized supporting data. Methods Cross‐sectional studies assessing integration of ADD‐RS with DD for diagnosis of AASs were identified on MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web Of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles, assessed quality, and extracted data. The quality of design and reporting was evaluated with the QUADAS‐2 and STARD tools. Individual patient data were obtained, to allow analysis of both conventional (500 ng/mL) and age‐adjusted (DDage‐adj) DD cutoffs. Data were summarized for four diagnostic strategies combining ADD‐RS = 0 or ≤ 1, with DD < 500 ng/mL or < DDage‐adj. The statistical heterogeneity of the diagnostic variables was estimated with Higgins’ I2. Pooled values were calculated for variables showing nonsignificant heterogeneity. Results After screening of 680 studies, four articles (including a total of 3,804 patients) met inclusion criteria. One prospective study provided a low risk of bias/applicability concerns, while methodologic limitations were found in the other three retrospective studies. Statistical heterogeneity was negligible for sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR) values and significant for specificity and positive LR values of all diagnostic strategies. Pooled sensitivity was 99.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 99.3% to 100%, I2 = 0) for ADD‐RS = 0 and DD < 500 ng/mL or < DDage‐adj, 98.9% (95% CI = 97.9% to 99.9%, I2 = 0) for ADD‐RS ≤ 1 and DD < 500 ng/mL, and 97.6% (95% CI = 96.3% to 98.9%, I2 = 0) for ADD‐RS ≤ 1 and DD < DDage‐adj. Conclusions Despite methodologic limitations, integration of ADD‐RS = 0 or ≤ 1 with DD < 500 ng/mL shows negligible heterogeneity and consistently high sensitivity across studies, thus supporting reliability for diagnostic rule‐out of AASs. Data supporting ADD‐RS = 0 plus DDage‐adj appear preliminary and require further scrutiny.
2020
1
10
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acem.13969
D-dimer; aorta; diagnosis; dissection; score
Bima, Paolo; Pivetta, Emanuele; Nazerian, Peiman; Toyofuku, Mamoru; Gorla, Riccardo; Bossone, Eduardo; Erbel, Raimund; Lupia, Enrico; Morello, Fulvio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
submission file rev2.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 3.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.86 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1737191
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact