Catholic legal and doctrinal tradition defined two main cases for the canonization of saints: until very recently, sainthood was related either to martyrdom or to the heroic practice of virtues, ascertained through a well-defined judicial procedure. In 2017, Pope Francis renewed this ancient tradition by introducing a third case, consisting in the “offering of life”, namely the sacrifice of one’s life in the name of charity, intended as Christian love for the others. The “offering of life” is placed at the center of an ongoing process of mediation between papal authority, the judicial praxis of the causes for canonization, and ecclesiastic law. The introduction of this new type of sainthood can be explained in light of the growing difficulty to apply the two traditional grids of behavior established by the Church in the evaluation of the life of new kinds of persons who enjoy a widespread fame of sanctity, but are not conform to the strict jurisprudential criteria of martrydrom and heroicity. Therefore, the debate surrounding the “offering of life” entails a dialectics between the necessity of a rationalized set of models, providing precise—and thus evaluable—“narrative programs” (Greimas) and defining a circumscribed number of canonizable human types, and the unprecedented multiplication of instances of sanctity in the contemporary world.

The Case of the “Offering of Life” in the Causes for Canonization of Catholic Saints: The Threshold of Self-Sacrifice

Ponzo J.
2020-01-01

Abstract

Catholic legal and doctrinal tradition defined two main cases for the canonization of saints: until very recently, sainthood was related either to martyrdom or to the heroic practice of virtues, ascertained through a well-defined judicial procedure. In 2017, Pope Francis renewed this ancient tradition by introducing a third case, consisting in the “offering of life”, namely the sacrifice of one’s life in the name of charity, intended as Christian love for the others. The “offering of life” is placed at the center of an ongoing process of mediation between papal authority, the judicial praxis of the causes for canonization, and ecclesiastic law. The introduction of this new type of sainthood can be explained in light of the growing difficulty to apply the two traditional grids of behavior established by the Church in the evaluation of the life of new kinds of persons who enjoy a widespread fame of sanctity, but are not conform to the strict jurisprudential criteria of martrydrom and heroicity. Therefore, the debate surrounding the “offering of life” entails a dialectics between the necessity of a rationalized set of models, providing precise—and thus evaluable—“narrative programs” (Greimas) and defining a circumscribed number of canonizable human types, and the unprecedented multiplication of instances of sanctity in the contemporary world.
2020
33
4
983
1003
https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s11196-020-09713-w?sharing_token=e1Nsgg8g19hHsCKYWAXBSfe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY5S7_gNteWgvVC8ZxD4D2WuCk8LU1tF_WwumwVCokjXwSFTyDo2gsUDQMNlKl48_Ra3vx16iLXGv7_PTkHc0kFW9BFqnc5CfoP1TfdLOs6iC-OeTg3n87SVZI9_JTjLSmw=
Canon jurisprudence; Canonization; Form of life; Sainthood; Self-sacrifice; Threshold
Ponzo J.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ponzo2020_Article_TheCaseOfTheOfferingOfLifeInTh-1.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 580.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
580.76 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
offering of Life Ponzo AAM.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 584.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
584.59 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1747564
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact