Background: Only few studies, with small patient cohorts, have evaluated the effect of radiotherapy (RT) for metaplastic breast cancer (MBC). Hence, it is important to investigate the role of RT in MBC survival using a large population-database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) from 1973 to 2015 was performed. We compared MBC patients with or without RT for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Results: From a total of 2267 patients diagnosed with MBC between 1998 and 2015, 1086 (47.9%) received RT. In the multivariate analysis before PSM, RT provided a better OS (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.88; p = 0.001) and BCSS (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88; p = 0.002). Multivariate analyses after PSM (n = 1066) confirmed that patients receiving RT (n = 506) survived longer than those without RT (OS, HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.80; p < 0.001 and BCSS, HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50-0.83; p = 0.001). A longer OS was observed when RT was given to older patients (p = 0.001) and in case of large tumor size (p = 0.002). Intriguingly, patients with N0 stage showed better OS after RT (HR 0.69, P = 0.012). Conclusions: Our findings support the beneficial effect of RT for MBC patients. In particular, older patients or with large tumor size have a greater survival benefit from RT. In conclusion, we have assessed the importance of the use of RT in MBC as survival factor and this could lead to the development of guidelines for this rare sub-Type of tumors.

The role of radiotherapy in metaplastic breast cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of the SEER database

Pardini B.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: Only few studies, with small patient cohorts, have evaluated the effect of radiotherapy (RT) for metaplastic breast cancer (MBC). Hence, it is important to investigate the role of RT in MBC survival using a large population-database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) from 1973 to 2015 was performed. We compared MBC patients with or without RT for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Results: From a total of 2267 patients diagnosed with MBC between 1998 and 2015, 1086 (47.9%) received RT. In the multivariate analysis before PSM, RT provided a better OS (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.88; p = 0.001) and BCSS (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88; p = 0.002). Multivariate analyses after PSM (n = 1066) confirmed that patients receiving RT (n = 506) survived longer than those without RT (OS, HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.80; p < 0.001 and BCSS, HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50-0.83; p = 0.001). A longer OS was observed when RT was given to older patients (p = 0.001) and in case of large tumor size (p = 0.002). Intriguingly, patients with N0 stage showed better OS after RT (HR 0.69, P = 0.012). Conclusions: Our findings support the beneficial effect of RT for MBC patients. In particular, older patients or with large tumor size have a greater survival benefit from RT. In conclusion, we have assessed the importance of the use of RT in MBC as survival factor and this could lead to the development of guidelines for this rare sub-Type of tumors.
2019
17
1
1
12
Breast neoplasms; Metaplastic breast cancer; Prognosis; Radiotherapy; Survival; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasm Metastasis; Databases, Factual; Disease-Free Survival; Propensity Score; SEER Program
Li Y.; Chen M.; Pardini B.; Dragomir M.P.; Lucci A.; Calin G.A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Li et al 2019.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.1 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1765053
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact