The article analyses how the Italian legal scholarship and highest courts have construed the Italian constitutional tradition and the notion of common constitutional traditions. It starts with a brief overview of the notion of “legal tradition” in comparative legal scholarship, and then considers the differences between the latter and other neighbouring, but different, concepts. After that, the work gives an account of the authors who have provided the most valuable contributions in the field, and then surveys how the high courts have made use of the expression of (common) constitutional traditions. The conclusion suggests a categorization of such uses.
The Use of National and Common Constitutional Traditions in Italian Legal Scholarship and High-Level Courts
de caria
2020-01-01
Abstract
The article analyses how the Italian legal scholarship and highest courts have construed the Italian constitutional tradition and the notion of common constitutional traditions. It starts with a brief overview of the notion of “legal tradition” in comparative legal scholarship, and then considers the differences between the latter and other neighbouring, but different, concepts. After that, the work gives an account of the authors who have provided the most valuable contributions in the field, and then surveys how the high courts have made use of the expression of (common) constitutional traditions. The conclusion suggests a categorization of such uses.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
13_deCaria IJPL published.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo da sito rivista
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
225.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
225.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.