Background: To analyze the potential effect of social inequality on pancreatic cancer risk in Western Europe, by reassessing the association within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study, including a larger number of cases and an extended follow-up. Methods: Data on highest education attained were gathered for 459,170 participants (70% women) from 10 European countries. A relative index of inequality (RII) based on adult education was calculated for comparability across countries and generations. Cox regression models were applied to estimate relative inequality in pancreatic cancer risk, stratifying by age, gender, and center, and adjusting for known pancreatic cancer risk factors. Results: A total of 1,223 incident pancreatic cancer cases were included after a mean follow-up of 13.9 (4.0) years. An inverse social trend was found in models adjusted for age, sex, and center for both sexes [HR of RII, 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.59], which was also significant among women (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.92). Further adjusting by smoking intensity, alcohol consumption, body mass index, prevalent diabetes, and physical activity led to an attenuation of the RII risk and loss of statistical significance. Conclusions: The present reanalysis does not sustain the existence of an independent social inequality influence on pancreatic cancer risk in Western European women and men, using an index based on adult education, the most relevant social indicator linked to individual lifestyles, in a context of very low pancreatic cancer survival from (quasi) universal public health systems. Impact: The results do not support an association between education and risk of pancreatic cancer.

Socioeconomic effect of education on pancreatic cancer risk in western Europe: An update on the EPIC cohorts study

Ricceri F.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: To analyze the potential effect of social inequality on pancreatic cancer risk in Western Europe, by reassessing the association within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study, including a larger number of cases and an extended follow-up. Methods: Data on highest education attained were gathered for 459,170 participants (70% women) from 10 European countries. A relative index of inequality (RII) based on adult education was calculated for comparability across countries and generations. Cox regression models were applied to estimate relative inequality in pancreatic cancer risk, stratifying by age, gender, and center, and adjusting for known pancreatic cancer risk factors. Results: A total of 1,223 incident pancreatic cancer cases were included after a mean follow-up of 13.9 (4.0) years. An inverse social trend was found in models adjusted for age, sex, and center for both sexes [HR of RII, 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.59], which was also significant among women (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.92). Further adjusting by smoking intensity, alcohol consumption, body mass index, prevalent diabetes, and physical activity led to an attenuation of the RII risk and loss of statistical significance. Conclusions: The present reanalysis does not sustain the existence of an independent social inequality influence on pancreatic cancer risk in Western European women and men, using an index based on adult education, the most relevant social indicator linked to individual lifestyles, in a context of very low pancreatic cancer survival from (quasi) universal public health systems. Impact: The results do not support an association between education and risk of pancreatic cancer.
2019
28
6
1089
1092
Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Educational Status; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Life Style; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Nutrition Assessment; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Socioeconomic Factors
Cirera L.; Huerta J.M.; Chirlaque M.D.; Overvad K.; Lindstrom M.; Regner S.; Tjonneland A.; Boutron-Ruault M.-C.; Rebours V.; Fagherazzi G.; Katzke V.A.; Boeing H.; Peppa E.; Trichopoulou A.; Valanou E.; Palli D.; Grioni S.; Panico S.; Tumino R.; Ricceri F.; Van Gils C.; Vermeulen R.C.H.; Skeie G.; Braaten T.; Weiderpass E.; Merino S.; Sanchez M.J.; Larranaga N.; Ardanaz E.; Sund M.; Khaw K.-T.; Key T.J.; Jenab M.; Naudin S.; Murphy N.; Aune D.; Ward H.; Riboli E.; Bueno-De-Mesquita B.; Navarro C.; Duell E.J.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cireraetal2019_CEBP.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 236.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
236.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1766500
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact