A continuum of homogeneous rational agents choose between two competing technologies. Agents observe a private signal and sample others’ previous choices. Signals have an aggregate component of uncertainty, so aggregate behavior does not necessarily reflect the true state of nature. Nonetheless, agents still find others’ choices informative, and base their decisions partly on others’ behavior. Consequently, bad choices can be perpetuated: aggregate uncertainty makes agents herd on the inferior technology with positive probability. I derive the optimal decision rule when agents sample exactly two individuals. I also present examples with herds on the inferior technology for arbitrarily large sample sizes

Aggregate Uncertainty Can Lead to Incorrect Herds

Monzon I
2017-01-01

Abstract

A continuum of homogeneous rational agents choose between two competing technologies. Agents observe a private signal and sample others’ previous choices. Signals have an aggregate component of uncertainty, so aggregate behavior does not necessarily reflect the true state of nature. Nonetheless, agents still find others’ choices informative, and base their decisions partly on others’ behavior. Consequently, bad choices can be perpetuated: aggregate uncertainty makes agents herd on the inferior technology with positive probability. I derive the optimal decision rule when agents sample exactly two individuals. I also present examples with herds on the inferior technology for arbitrarily large sample sizes
2017
9
2
295
314
Monzon I
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Monzon, Aggregate Uncertainty Can Lead to Incorrect Herds, AEJ Micro 2017.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 568.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
568.95 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1768194
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact