22 patients awaiting bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and 65 unrelated healthy HLA-A, B and DR serologically identical donors were studied. 21 patients were non reactive on mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) towards at least one BMT donor, resulting in 32 pairs MLC-negative. 33 other HLA-matched donors gave proliferative responses on MLC. The phenotype DR3/DR7 was significantly higher in patients (P) and donors (D) studied (p < 0.00001). P and D pairs were DNA typed by RFLP analysis for DRB, DQA and DQB genes, and DNA matched by PCR Fingerprinting (PCRF) for DRB, DQA, DQB and DPB. Six patients and 18 donors were also oligotyped for the subtypes of DR1, DR3, DR4 and DR5. Patients and donors were divided according to identity on RFLP, PCRF and responsiveness on MLC, represented by RRI. In the group of MLC non responder pairs, 11% had differences on DRB PCRF compared to 57% in the group of MLC responders (p = 0.0002). The mean RRI value of PCRF DRB incompatible pairs was significantly higher compared to RRI of compatible pairs (p = 0.012) With respect to PCRF for DPB, 75% of MLC-ve pairs were different. Also the mean RRI value was significantly lower in DPB identical pairs compared to non identical ones (p = 0.048) The compatibility between P/D pairs assessed by oligotyping was in accordance with DRB PCRF. PCRF for DQB, but not for DNA, corresponded to MLC responses. Our findings confirm that PCRF offers a precise and fast alternative in DNA matching for DRB. We also suggest that PCRF for DQB and DPB, together with DRB, could eventually substitute MLC.
Identification of unrelated HLA-identical bone marrow donors: RFLP, oligotyping and PCR fingerprinting for HLA class II compared to MLC responses
Amoroso A.
1993-01-01
Abstract
22 patients awaiting bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and 65 unrelated healthy HLA-A, B and DR serologically identical donors were studied. 21 patients were non reactive on mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) towards at least one BMT donor, resulting in 32 pairs MLC-negative. 33 other HLA-matched donors gave proliferative responses on MLC. The phenotype DR3/DR7 was significantly higher in patients (P) and donors (D) studied (p < 0.00001). P and D pairs were DNA typed by RFLP analysis for DRB, DQA and DQB genes, and DNA matched by PCR Fingerprinting (PCRF) for DRB, DQA, DQB and DPB. Six patients and 18 donors were also oligotyped for the subtypes of DR1, DR3, DR4 and DR5. Patients and donors were divided according to identity on RFLP, PCRF and responsiveness on MLC, represented by RRI. In the group of MLC non responder pairs, 11% had differences on DRB PCRF compared to 57% in the group of MLC responders (p = 0.0002). The mean RRI value of PCRF DRB incompatible pairs was significantly higher compared to RRI of compatible pairs (p = 0.012) With respect to PCRF for DPB, 75% of MLC-ve pairs were different. Also the mean RRI value was significantly lower in DPB identical pairs compared to non identical ones (p = 0.048) The compatibility between P/D pairs assessed by oligotyping was in accordance with DRB PCRF. PCRF for DQB, but not for DNA, corresponded to MLC responses. Our findings confirm that PCRF offers a precise and fast alternative in DNA matching for DRB. We also suggest that PCRF for DQB and DPB, together with DRB, could eventually substitute MLC.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
