Plants rely on their microbiota for improving the nutritional status and environmental stress tolerance. Previous studies mainly focused on bipartite interactions (a plant challenged by a single microbe), while plant responses to multiple microbes have received limited attention. Here, we investigated local and systemic changes induced in wheat by two plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), Azospirillum brasilense and Paraburkholderia graminis, either alone or together with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF). We conducted phenotypic, proteomic, and biochemical analyses to investigate bipartite (wheat-PGPB) and tripartite (wheat-PGPB-AMF) interactions, also upon a leaf pathogen infection. Results revealed that only AMF and A. brasilense promoted plant growth by activating photosynthesis and N assimilation which led to increased glucose and amino acid content. The bioprotective effect of the PGPB-AMF interactions on infected wheat plants depended on the PGPB-AMF combinations, which caused specific phenotypic and proteomic responses (elicitation of defense related proteins, immune response and jasmonic acid biosynthesis). In the whole, wheat responses strongly depended on the inoculum composition (single vs. multiple microbes) and the investigated organs (roots vs. leaf). Our findings showed that AMF is the best-performing microbe, suggesting its presence as the crucial one for synthetic microbial community development.

Proteomic analysis reveals how pairing of a Mycorrhizal fungus with plant growth‐promoting bacteria modulates growth and defense in wheat

Fiorilli, Valentina
Co-first
;
Novero, Mara;Bonfante, Paola
Last
2021-01-01

Abstract

Plants rely on their microbiota for improving the nutritional status and environmental stress tolerance. Previous studies mainly focused on bipartite interactions (a plant challenged by a single microbe), while plant responses to multiple microbes have received limited attention. Here, we investigated local and systemic changes induced in wheat by two plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), Azospirillum brasilense and Paraburkholderia graminis, either alone or together with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF). We conducted phenotypic, proteomic, and biochemical analyses to investigate bipartite (wheat-PGPB) and tripartite (wheat-PGPB-AMF) interactions, also upon a leaf pathogen infection. Results revealed that only AMF and A. brasilense promoted plant growth by activating photosynthesis and N assimilation which led to increased glucose and amino acid content. The bioprotective effect of the PGPB-AMF interactions on infected wheat plants depended on the PGPB-AMF combinations, which caused specific phenotypic and proteomic responses (elicitation of defense related proteins, immune response and jasmonic acid biosynthesis). In the whole, wheat responses strongly depended on the inoculum composition (single vs. multiple microbes) and the investigated organs (roots vs. leaf). Our findings showed that AMF is the best-performing microbe, suggesting its presence as the crucial one for synthetic microbial community development.
2021
1
15
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pce.14039
Vannini, Candida; Domingo, Guido; Fiorilli, Valentina; Seco, Daniel Garçia; Novero, Mara; Marsoni, Milena; Wisniewski‐Dye, Florence; Bracale, Marcella...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pce.14039.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: PDF Editoriale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 4.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.42 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Vannini et al_PCE.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Vannini et al., postprin
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 775.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
775.18 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1783474
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact