Burn patients are at high risk of infections due to severe impairment of immunity and loss of skin barrier function. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, incidence and risk factors for infection in a cohort of burns patients. Two hundred patients were retrospectively enrolled and subdivided into infected (N = 81) and uninfected groups (N = 119). The cumulative prevalence of infections was 27% on day 7 and 43.8% on day 28. Skin and soft tissue infections (32%) were the most frequent. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (25%) infections were most prevalent. An indwelling central venous catheter (CVC; sub-hazard ratio [SHR] 7.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.78–14.62) and revised Baux score (RBS; SHR 2.08, 95% CI 0.98–4.42) were associated with higher incremental infection rate while surgical treatment resulted in a protective factor (SHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29–0.75). RBS may be useful to stratify the infection risk: a strict collaboration between surgeons and infectious disease specialists is needed to implement source control and antimicrobial surveillance.

Epidemiology, prevalence and risk factors for infections in burn patients: results from a regional burn centre’s analysis

Corcione S.
First
;
Pensa A.;Lupia T.
;
Stella M.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Burn patients are at high risk of infections due to severe impairment of immunity and loss of skin barrier function. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, incidence and risk factors for infection in a cohort of burns patients. Two hundred patients were retrospectively enrolled and subdivided into infected (N = 81) and uninfected groups (N = 119). The cumulative prevalence of infections was 27% on day 7 and 43.8% on day 28. Skin and soft tissue infections (32%) were the most frequent. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (25%) infections were most prevalent. An indwelling central venous catheter (CVC; sub-hazard ratio [SHR] 7.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.78–14.62) and revised Baux score (RBS; SHR 2.08, 95% CI 0.98–4.42) were associated with higher incremental infection rate while surgical treatment resulted in a protective factor (SHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29–0.75). RBS may be useful to stratify the infection risk: a strict collaboration between surgeons and infectious disease specialists is needed to implement source control and antimicrobial surveillance.
2021
33
1
62
66
antimicrobial stewardship; Burns; epidemiology; infections; multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs); Revised Baux score (RBS)
Corcione S.; Pensa A.; Castiglione A.; Lupia T.; Bortolaso B.; Romeo M.R.; Stella M.; Rosa F.G.D.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Epidemiology burn.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 729.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
729.77 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1785646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact