Nasal cytology is an easy, cheap, non-invasive and point-of-care method to assess nasal inflammation and disease-specific cellular features. By means of nasal cytology, it is possible to distinguish between different inflammatory patterns that are typically associated with specific diseases (ie, allergic and non-allergic rhinitis). Its use is particularly relevant when other clinical information, such as signs, symptoms, time-course and allergic sensitizations, is not enough to recognize which of the different rhinitis phenotypes is involved; for example, it is only by means of nasal cytology that it is possible to distinguish, among the non-allergic rhinitis, those characterized by eosinophilic (NARES), mast cellular (NARMA), mixed eosinophilic-mast cellular (NARESMA) or neutrophilic (NARNE) inflammation. Despite its clinical usefulness, cheapness, non-invasiveness and easiness, nasal cytology is still underused and this is at least partially due to the fact that, as far as now, there is not a consensus or an official recommendation on its methodological issues. We here review the scientific literature about nasal cytology, giving recommendations on how to perform and interpret nasal cytology.

Nasal cytology: Methodology with application to clinical practice and research

Heffler E.;Guida G.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Nasal cytology is an easy, cheap, non-invasive and point-of-care method to assess nasal inflammation and disease-specific cellular features. By means of nasal cytology, it is possible to distinguish between different inflammatory patterns that are typically associated with specific diseases (ie, allergic and non-allergic rhinitis). Its use is particularly relevant when other clinical information, such as signs, symptoms, time-course and allergic sensitizations, is not enough to recognize which of the different rhinitis phenotypes is involved; for example, it is only by means of nasal cytology that it is possible to distinguish, among the non-allergic rhinitis, those characterized by eosinophilic (NARES), mast cellular (NARMA), mixed eosinophilic-mast cellular (NARESMA) or neutrophilic (NARNE) inflammation. Despite its clinical usefulness, cheapness, non-invasiveness and easiness, nasal cytology is still underused and this is at least partially due to the fact that, as far as now, there is not a consensus or an official recommendation on its methodological issues. We here review the scientific literature about nasal cytology, giving recommendations on how to perform and interpret nasal cytology.
2018
48
9
1092
1106
Animals; Biofilms; Biopsy; Humans; Nasal Mucosa; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Research; Rhinitis; Therapeutic Irrigation; Cytodiagnosis
Heffler E.; Landi M.; Caruso C.; Fichera S.; Gani F.; Guida G.; Liuzzo M.T.; Pistorio M.P.; Pizzimenti S.; Riccio A.M.; Seccia V.; Ferrando M.; Malvezzi L.; Passalacqua G.; Gelardi M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
heffler E Nasal cytology Methodology with application to clinical.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 2.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.16 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1786398
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact