Scientists’ research interests are often skewed toward charismatic organisms, but quantifying research biases is challenging. By combining bibliometric data with trait-based approaches and using a well-studied alpine flora as a case study, we demonstrate that morphological and colour traits, as well as range size, have significantly more impact on species choice for wild flowering plants than traits related to ecology and rarity. These biases should be taken into account to inform more objective plant conservation efforts.
Plant scientists’ research attention is skewed towards colourful, conspicuous and broadly distributed flowers
Adamo, Martino
First
;Chialva, Matteo;Calevo, Jacopo;Mammola, StefanoLast
2021-01-01
Abstract
Scientists’ research interests are often skewed toward charismatic organisms, but quantifying research biases is challenging. By combining bibliometric data with trait-based approaches and using a well-studied alpine flora as a case study, we demonstrate that morphological and colour traits, as well as range size, have significantly more impact on species choice for wild flowering plants than traits related to ecology and rarity. These biases should be taken into account to inform more objective plant conservation efforts.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Adamo 2021 - nplants.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
2.55 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.55 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



