Scientists’ research interests are often skewed toward charismatic organisms, but quantifying research biases is challenging. By combining bibliometric data with trait-based approaches and using a well-studied alpine flora as a case study, we demonstrate that morphological and colour traits, as well as range size, have significantly more impact on species choice for wild flowering plants than traits related to ecology and rarity. These biases should be taken into account to inform more objective plant conservation efforts.

Plant scientists’ research attention is skewed towards colourful, conspicuous and broadly distributed flowers

Adamo, Martino
First
;
Chialva, Matteo;Calevo, Jacopo;Mammola, Stefano
Last
2021-01-01

Abstract

Scientists’ research interests are often skewed toward charismatic organisms, but quantifying research biases is challenging. By combining bibliometric data with trait-based approaches and using a well-studied alpine flora as a case study, we demonstrate that morphological and colour traits, as well as range size, have significantly more impact on species choice for wild flowering plants than traits related to ecology and rarity. These biases should be taken into account to inform more objective plant conservation efforts.
2021
7
5
574
578
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-021-00912-2
Adamo, Martino; Chialva, Matteo; Calevo, Jacopo; Bertoni, Filippo; Dixon, Kingsley; Mammola, Stefano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Adamo 2021 - nplants.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 2.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.55 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1788667
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 67
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact