The article deals with the rich internal typological diversity of the Romance languages, which can be captured only very partially by looking at the six major standard languages, as typological databases often do. This diversity spans over all the levels of linguistic analysis, from phonology to morphology and syntax. The article focusses on four main areas in some detail, aiming at developing a discussion on their theoretical and methodological import. The comparison with the full-world typological background given by the WALS Online shows that the differences within Romance may reach the level of general typological relevance, especially in fields like nominal pluralization and the syntax of negation, which are both areas where the Romance languages have often distanced themselves quite significantly from Latin. The morphological marking of nominal plural displays four values out of the seven recorded in WALS, adding a further one unattested there, namely subtraction; the negation strategies, although uniformly particle-like, cover all the five values found in WALS concerning linear order. Finally, Romance languages suggest several intriguing issues related with head-marking and dependent-marking constructions, again innovating against the substantially dependent-marking uniformity characteristic of Latin.
Typological Diversity Within the Romance Languages
Ricca, Davide
2021-01-01
Abstract
The article deals with the rich internal typological diversity of the Romance languages, which can be captured only very partially by looking at the six major standard languages, as typological databases often do. This diversity spans over all the levels of linguistic analysis, from phonology to morphology and syntax. The article focusses on four main areas in some detail, aiming at developing a discussion on their theoretical and methodological import. The comparison with the full-world typological background given by the WALS Online shows that the differences within Romance may reach the level of general typological relevance, especially in fields like nominal pluralization and the syntax of negation, which are both areas where the Romance languages have often distanced themselves quite significantly from Latin. The morphological marking of nominal plural displays four values out of the seven recorded in WALS, adding a further one unattested there, namely subtraction; the negation strategies, although uniformly particle-like, cover all the five values found in WALS concerning linear order. Finally, Romance languages suggest several intriguing issues related with head-marking and dependent-marking constructions, again innovating against the substantially dependent-marking uniformity characteristic of Latin.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Ricca 2021 - Typological diversity within the Romance languages - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics - PREPRINT.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
613.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
613.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.