The holographic will has often generated judicial issues: from its potential forgery, to its invalidation, from the interpretation of unclear clauses, to the overlapping of other subsequent testamentary dispositions which modify the previous ones. An example is the controversy which arose over the holographic will of a well-known painter, Giuseppe Augusto Levis, belonging to one of the most distinguished Piedmontese families and owner of considerable assets. The lawsuit was filed in 1947 at the Court of Turin; the judge-rapporteur was Alessandro Galante Garrone. Renowned lawyers and a well-known magistrate, later bound to have a crucial role in the academic world as well, found themselves having to face a peculiar issue with complex implications.
Tra accademia e foro: l’eredità controversa del pittore Giuseppe A. Levis
Francesco Campobello
First
2021-01-01
Abstract
The holographic will has often generated judicial issues: from its potential forgery, to its invalidation, from the interpretation of unclear clauses, to the overlapping of other subsequent testamentary dispositions which modify the previous ones. An example is the controversy which arose over the holographic will of a well-known painter, Giuseppe Augusto Levis, belonging to one of the most distinguished Piedmontese families and owner of considerable assets. The lawsuit was filed in 1947 at the Court of Turin; the judge-rapporteur was Alessandro Galante Garrone. Renowned lawyers and a well-known magistrate, later bound to have a crucial role in the academic world as well, found themselves having to face a peculiar issue with complex implications.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CAMPOBELLO_Tra accademia e foro Levis.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
375.91 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
375.91 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.