Constructing National Identity in Men vs Women’s Magazines: A Case Study from the USA

National identity plays an important role in defining many people’s attitude towards reality. Its representation has been under the radar within the field of linguistics for decades, being investigated in a number of different genres, from political speeches to advertisement; in this regard, however, a gap can be found when it comes to magazines. This study focuses on the U.S. national context and seeks to reveal how a range of discursive devices – including lexical, syntactic and metaphorical patterns – are used in the representation of the nation and national identity in popular magazines published in the USA. The analysis provides a comparison based on the target audience’s gender identity. A mixed methods approach is applied to two corpora, covering a time span between 2015 and 2020 and comprising a total of approximately 9 million words from popular magazines aimed respectively at a female (Allure, Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, Vanity Fair and Vogue) and male audience (Men’s Health, Popular Mechanics, Esquire and GQ). Firstly, we employed corpus-assisted methods to explore the data at a more general level, drawing on concordance and collocation analysis. Secondly, we carried out in-depth, qualitative analysis of relevant words and expressions looking at their wider textual context. Thirdly, we compared the results between corpora. The analysis shows some common patterns – e.g., a strong use of personification of the country, often represented as facing a moment of crisis – as well as interesting differences in how these patterns are articulated in the two corpora.