Controversy exists regarding the definition and prognostic significance of bulk in advanced-stage (stage III/IV) Hodgkin lymphoma (ASHL), and bulk location (mediastinum vs other sites) further complicated the setting. This retrospective, multi-institutional study comprised 814 ASHL patients between 2000 and 2010 and aimed to evaluate the significance of bulk in ASHL. End points of interest included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Covariates included maximum diameter and the site of bulky disease. SmoothHR and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess for an association of PFS and OS with covariates. In the exploratory cohort (n 5 683), maximum diameter had no association with PFS and a complex, U-shaped association with all-cause mortality on smoothHR analysis. Using 5 cm as a cutoff for bulk, Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed the smoothHR results. The site of bulk was incorporated to divide patients into 2 groups. The mediastinal bulk (MB) type had more favorable characteristics than the nonbulky/non-MB (NB/NMB) type on age, histology, and bone marrow involvement (P, .001). The MB type was associated with better OS than the NB/NMB-type on univariable analysis (5-year OS, 92% vs 86%; HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.84; P 5 .007). These findings persisted in the subgroup treated with chemotherapy alone and were confirmed in an independent validation cohort (n 5 131). Our findings indicate that mediastinal bulk was associated with more favorable disease characteristics and improved OS in ASHL, and may be a surrogate of a more favorable biology.

Two distinct prognostic groups in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma revealed by the presence and site of bulky disease

Levis M.;Ricardi U.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the definition and prognostic significance of bulk in advanced-stage (stage III/IV) Hodgkin lymphoma (ASHL), and bulk location (mediastinum vs other sites) further complicated the setting. This retrospective, multi-institutional study comprised 814 ASHL patients between 2000 and 2010 and aimed to evaluate the significance of bulk in ASHL. End points of interest included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Covariates included maximum diameter and the site of bulky disease. SmoothHR and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess for an association of PFS and OS with covariates. In the exploratory cohort (n 5 683), maximum diameter had no association with PFS and a complex, U-shaped association with all-cause mortality on smoothHR analysis. Using 5 cm as a cutoff for bulk, Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed the smoothHR results. The site of bulk was incorporated to divide patients into 2 groups. The mediastinal bulk (MB) type had more favorable characteristics than the nonbulky/non-MB (NB/NMB) type on age, histology, and bone marrow involvement (P, .001). The MB type was associated with better OS than the NB/NMB-type on univariable analysis (5-year OS, 92% vs 86%; HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.84; P 5 .007). These findings persisted in the subgroup treated with chemotherapy alone and were confirmed in an independent validation cohort (n 5 131). Our findings indicate that mediastinal bulk was associated with more favorable disease characteristics and improved OS in ASHL, and may be a surrogate of a more favorable biology.
2020
4
9
2064
2072
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Hodgkin Disease
Qi S.; Milgrom S.; Dabaja B.; Tsang R.; Levis M.; Ricardi U.; Lopez-Alonso R.; Dann E.J.; Ng A.; Yahalom J.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Two distinct prognostic groups ... 2020.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 923.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
923.18 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1795626
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact