Purpose of Review: To present the latest evidence related to the outcomes and cost of single-use, disposable ureteric stent removal system (Isiris). Recent Findings: Our review suggests that compared to a reusable flexible cystoscope (re-FC), a disposable flexible cystoscope (d-FC) with built-in grasper (Isiris) significantly reduced procedural time and provided a cost benefit when the latter was used in a ward or outpatient clinic-based setting. The use of d-FC also allowed endoscopy slots to be used for other urgent diagnostic procedures. Summary: Disposable FCs are effective and safe for ureteric stent removal. They offer greater flexibility and, in most cases, have been demonstrated to be cost-effective compared to re-FCs. They are at their most useful in remote, low-volume centres, in less well-developed countries and in centres where large demand is placed on endoscopy resources.

Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature

Oderda M.;Gontero P.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Purpose of Review: To present the latest evidence related to the outcomes and cost of single-use, disposable ureteric stent removal system (Isiris). Recent Findings: Our review suggests that compared to a reusable flexible cystoscope (re-FC), a disposable flexible cystoscope (d-FC) with built-in grasper (Isiris) significantly reduced procedural time and provided a cost benefit when the latter was used in a ward or outpatient clinic-based setting. The use of d-FC also allowed endoscopy slots to be used for other urgent diagnostic procedures. Summary: Disposable FCs are effective and safe for ureteric stent removal. They offer greater flexibility and, in most cases, have been demonstrated to be cost-effective compared to re-FCs. They are at their most useful in remote, low-volume centres, in less well-developed countries and in centres where large demand is placed on endoscopy resources.
2021
22
8
1
7
Cystoscopy; Kidney calculi; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Stent; Ureteroscopy; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cystoscopy; Device Removal; Humans; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Ureter; Costs and Cost Analysis
Hughes T.; Pietropaolo A.; Jones P.; Oderda M.; Gontero P.; Somani B.K.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Hughes2021_Article_OutcomesAndCostEvaluationRelat.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 393.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
393.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1795728
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact