Purpose: Mediastinal radiation therapy (RT) in patients with lymphoma implies involuntary coronary artery (CA) exposure, resulting in an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate delineation of CAs may spare them from higher RT doses. However, heart motion affects the estimation of the dose received by CAs. An expansion margin (planning organ at risk volume [PRV]), encompassing the nearby area where CAs displace, may compensate for these uncertainties, reducing CA dose and CAD risk. Our study aimed to evaluate if a planning process optimized on CA-specific PRVs, rather than just on CAs, could provide any dosimetric or clinical benefit. Methods and Materials: Forty patients receiving RT for mediastinal lymphomas were included. We contoured left main trunk, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. An isotropic PRV was then applied to all CAs, in accordance with literature data. A comparison was then performed by optimizing treatment plans either on CAs or on PRVs, to detect any difference in CA sparing in terms of maximum (Dmax), median (Dmed), and mean (Dmean) dose. We then investigated, through risk modeling, if any dosimetric benefit obtained with the PRV-related optimization process could translate to a lower risk of ischemic complications. Results: Plan optimization on PRVs demonstrated a significant dose reduction (range, 7%-9%) in Dmax, Dmed, and Dmean for the whole coronary tree, and even higher dose reductions when vessels were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV (range, 13%-15%), especially for left main trunk and left circumflex (range, 16%-21%). This translated to a mean risk reduction of developing CAD of 12% (P < .01), which increased to 17% when CAs were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV. Conclusions: Integration of CA-related PRVs in the optimization process reduces the dose received by CAs and translates to a meaningful prevention of CAD risk in patients with lymphoma treated with mediastinal RT.

Adoption of Expansion Margins to Reduce the Dose Received by the Coronary Arteries and the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Lymphoma Patients

De Luca V.;Bartoncini S.;Sardo A.;Cavallin C.;Iorio G. C.;Orlandi E.;Parise R.;Palladino C.;Buonavita A.;Fiandra C.;Levis M.
;
Ricardi U.
Last
2021-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: Mediastinal radiation therapy (RT) in patients with lymphoma implies involuntary coronary artery (CA) exposure, resulting in an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate delineation of CAs may spare them from higher RT doses. However, heart motion affects the estimation of the dose received by CAs. An expansion margin (planning organ at risk volume [PRV]), encompassing the nearby area where CAs displace, may compensate for these uncertainties, reducing CA dose and CAD risk. Our study aimed to evaluate if a planning process optimized on CA-specific PRVs, rather than just on CAs, could provide any dosimetric or clinical benefit. Methods and Materials: Forty patients receiving RT for mediastinal lymphomas were included. We contoured left main trunk, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. An isotropic PRV was then applied to all CAs, in accordance with literature data. A comparison was then performed by optimizing treatment plans either on CAs or on PRVs, to detect any difference in CA sparing in terms of maximum (Dmax), median (Dmed), and mean (Dmean) dose. We then investigated, through risk modeling, if any dosimetric benefit obtained with the PRV-related optimization process could translate to a lower risk of ischemic complications. Results: Plan optimization on PRVs demonstrated a significant dose reduction (range, 7%-9%) in Dmax, Dmed, and Dmean for the whole coronary tree, and even higher dose reductions when vessels were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV (range, 13%-15%), especially for left main trunk and left circumflex (range, 16%-21%). This translated to a mean risk reduction of developing CAD of 12% (P < .01), which increased to 17% when CAs were located 5- to 20-mm from PTV. Conclusions: Integration of CA-related PRVs in the optimization process reduces the dose received by CAs and translates to a meaningful prevention of CAD risk in patients with lymphoma treated with mediastinal RT.
2021
11
1
66
73
Coronary Vessels; Heart; Humans; Organs at Risk; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Cardiovascular Diseases; Lymphoma; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
De Luca V.; Gallio E.; Bartoncini S.; Giglioli F.R.; Sardo A.; Cavallin C.; Iorio G.C.; Orlandi E.; Parise R.; Palladino C.; Buonavita A.; Fiandra C.;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
De Luca et al. PRO 2021.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 707.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
707.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1801870
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact