“Extremism” is a term and a concept that does not designate a precise, determined, and definitive location in the semiosphere (the abstract area in which a community produces, handles, and circulates meaning). As the etymology of the word itself suggests, its meaning is intrinsically topological and relational. Something can be extreme only by situating itself at the periphery of a spectrum, at the border of an area of potentialities. The term and the corresponding concept, moreover, signal that this spectrum, as well as this area, are not neutrally ar- ranged but contain at least one dialectics and, as a consequence, one polarization. In other words, “extremism” implicitly refers to an axiology, which includes also the impossibility not to adopt a perspective on it, a point of view. Thus, when something is qualified as an expression of “extremism”, such qualification inherently points out that: 1) this something, be it a statement or a behavior, is comparable and commensurable with other similar events in the semiosphere; 2) all these events can be arranged along a spectrum, in relation to the pertinence that determines their commensurability; 3) those who deem the statement or behavior as extreme consider that they are entitled to position themselves at the center of the spectrum, and simultaneously situate what they judge at one or the other extreme of it. The article semiotically investigates the meaning of “extremism” in pres- ent-day communication.

The Semiotics of Extremism

Leone, Massimo
2021-01-01

Abstract

“Extremism” is a term and a concept that does not designate a precise, determined, and definitive location in the semiosphere (the abstract area in which a community produces, handles, and circulates meaning). As the etymology of the word itself suggests, its meaning is intrinsically topological and relational. Something can be extreme only by situating itself at the periphery of a spectrum, at the border of an area of potentialities. The term and the corresponding concept, moreover, signal that this spectrum, as well as this area, are not neutrally ar- ranged but contain at least one dialectics and, as a consequence, one polarization. In other words, “extremism” implicitly refers to an axiology, which includes also the impossibility not to adopt a perspective on it, a point of view. Thus, when something is qualified as an expression of “extremism”, such qualification inherently points out that: 1) this something, be it a statement or a behavior, is comparable and commensurable with other similar events in the semiosphere; 2) all these events can be arranged along a spectrum, in relation to the pertinence that determines their commensurability; 3) those who deem the statement or behavior as extreme consider that they are entitled to position themselves at the center of the spectrum, and simultaneously situate what they judge at one or the other extreme of it. The article semiotically investigates the meaning of “extremism” in pres- ent-day communication.
2021
Differences, Similarities and Meanings: Semiotic Investigations of Contemporary Communication Phenomena
Walter de Gruyter
Semiotics, Communication and Cognition [SCC]
30
181
202
9783110662900
https://www-degruyter-com.bibliopass.unito.it/document/doi/10.1515/9783110662900/html
Extremism, communication, populism, cultural semiotics, interpre- tive community, hermeneutic reasonableness
Leone, Massimo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Massimo LEONE 2021 - The Semiotics of Extremism - Editorial PDF.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 27.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
27.51 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1815379
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact