Angular cheilitis (AC) is a clinical entity first described in the XIX century, character‐ ized by erythema, rhagades, ulcerations, and crusting of one or both lip commissures and perilabial skin, responsible of an unpleasant and painful discomfort. Aim of this manuscript was to examine and evaluate the therapeutic options actually available for AC. Despite antifungals being the first‐line treatment for most of clinicians, very limited scientific evidence supports their reliability, with just two RCTs published be‐ tween the 70’s and the 80’s. Furthermore, alternative topical treatments, various techniques of occlusal vertical dimension restoration, B‐vitamin supplementation, anti‐drooling prosthetic device, and photodynamic therapy have been experimented and proposed, mostly in the form of case reports or case series on a small number of individuals. Our group found in 1% isoconazole nitrate (ISN) and 0.1% diflucortolone valerate (DFV) ointment the most consistent AC treatment, due to the broad spec‐ trum of ISN against many species of dermatohpytes and bacteria, and the anti‐inflam‐ matory properties displayed by DFV. However, further and well‐designed trials on larger samples of patients are needed to assess the differential profile of consistency of the treatments outlined in literature and claimed by the authors of this paper.

Treatment of angular cheilitis: A narrative review and authors’ clinical experience.

Cabras M.;Gambino A.
Co-first
;
Broccoletti R.;Arduino P. G.
Last
2020-01-01

Abstract

Angular cheilitis (AC) is a clinical entity first described in the XIX century, character‐ ized by erythema, rhagades, ulcerations, and crusting of one or both lip commissures and perilabial skin, responsible of an unpleasant and painful discomfort. Aim of this manuscript was to examine and evaluate the therapeutic options actually available for AC. Despite antifungals being the first‐line treatment for most of clinicians, very limited scientific evidence supports their reliability, with just two RCTs published be‐ tween the 70’s and the 80’s. Furthermore, alternative topical treatments, various techniques of occlusal vertical dimension restoration, B‐vitamin supplementation, anti‐drooling prosthetic device, and photodynamic therapy have been experimented and proposed, mostly in the form of case reports or case series on a small number of individuals. Our group found in 1% isoconazole nitrate (ISN) and 0.1% diflucortolone valerate (DFV) ointment the most consistent AC treatment, due to the broad spec‐ trum of ISN against many species of dermatohpytes and bacteria, and the anti‐inflam‐ matory properties displayed by DFV. However, further and well‐designed trials on larger samples of patients are needed to assess the differential profile of consistency of the treatments outlined in literature and claimed by the authors of this paper.
2020
26
6
1107
1115
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1601-0825
https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/806408
angular cheilitis; cheilitis; narrative review; outcome; treatment
Cabras M.; Gambino A.; Broccoletti R.; Lodi G.; Arduino P.G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Oral Diseases - 2019 - Cabras - Treatment of angular cheilitis A narrative review and authors clinical experience.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 336.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
336.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1818529
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact