Accurate detection of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales from bloodstream infection (BSI) is of paramount importance for both epidemiological and clinical purposes, especially for optimization of antibiotic stewardship interventions. Three phenotypic methods for the detection of ESBL phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli BSI were compared over a 4-month period (May–August 2021) in a main University Hospital from Northern Italy. The methods were the biochemical Rapid ESBL NP®, the immunological NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and the E-test technique based on ESBL E-test®. One hundred forty-two blood cultures (BCs) positive for K. pneumoniae or E. coli were included. ESBL and carbapenemase phenotype were detected in 26.1% (n = 37) and 16.9% (n = 24), respectively. The Rapid ESBL NP®, NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and direct ESBL E-test® positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals were 1 (0.87–1) and 0.97 (0.92–0.99), 1 (0.87–1) and 0.97 (0.92–0.99), and 1 (0.88–1) and 1 (0.96–1), respectively. The three phenotypic methods evaluated showed good performance in the detection of ESBL phenotype from K. pneumoniae– or E. coli–positive BCs. Rapid ESBL NP® and NG-test CTX-M® offer the important advantage of a turnaround time of 15 to 45 min, and the Rapid ESBL NP test in addition detects any type of ESBL producers.
Direct detection of extended‑spectrum‑β‑lactamase‑producers in Enterobacterales from blood cultures: a comparative analysis
Matteo Boattini
Co-first
;Gabriele BiancoCo-first
;Sara Comini;Marco Iannaccone;Roberto Casale;Rossana Cavallo;Cristina Costa.Last
2022-01-01
Abstract
Accurate detection of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales from bloodstream infection (BSI) is of paramount importance for both epidemiological and clinical purposes, especially for optimization of antibiotic stewardship interventions. Three phenotypic methods for the detection of ESBL phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli BSI were compared over a 4-month period (May–August 2021) in a main University Hospital from Northern Italy. The methods were the biochemical Rapid ESBL NP®, the immunological NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and the E-test technique based on ESBL E-test®. One hundred forty-two blood cultures (BCs) positive for K. pneumoniae or E. coli were included. ESBL and carbapenemase phenotype were detected in 26.1% (n = 37) and 16.9% (n = 24), respectively. The Rapid ESBL NP®, NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and direct ESBL E-test® positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals were 1 (0.87–1) and 0.97 (0.92–0.99), 1 (0.87–1) and 0.97 (0.92–0.99), and 1 (0.88–1) and 1 (0.96–1), respectively. The three phenotypic methods evaluated showed good performance in the detection of ESBL phenotype from K. pneumoniae– or E. coli–positive BCs. Rapid ESBL NP® and NG-test CTX-M® offer the important advantage of a turnaround time of 15 to 45 min, and the Rapid ESBL NP test in addition detects any type of ESBL producers.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
10096_2021_Article_4385(1).pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
640.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
640.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
EJCM-D-21-01624_R1 (3).pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione
1.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.