after a brief reconstruction of the status quaestionis about our fragmentary knowledge of Alexander’s commentary (based on Moraux’ studies), and about the traces of the work in the Latin medieval world (based on Ebbesen’s studies), the article proposes the identification of two new traces in the Latin exegesis, the first in a scholium we find in the manuscript tradition of Robertus Grosseteste’s commentary, the second in Albertus Magnus’ commentary. Finally, a recent hypothesis stated by David Bloch gives the occasion for some considerations about the historical and theoretical weight of the hints of Alexander’s commentary in the Latin tradition of the Posterior Analytics.
"Alexander of Aphrodisias" in the Medieval Latin Tradition of the Posterior Analytics. Some Remarks.
Amos Corbini
2021-01-01
Abstract
after a brief reconstruction of the status quaestionis about our fragmentary knowledge of Alexander’s commentary (based on Moraux’ studies), and about the traces of the work in the Latin medieval world (based on Ebbesen’s studies), the article proposes the identification of two new traces in the Latin exegesis, the first in a scholium we find in the manuscript tradition of Robertus Grosseteste’s commentary, the second in Albertus Magnus’ commentary. Finally, a recent hypothesis stated by David Bloch gives the occasion for some considerations about the historical and theoretical weight of the hints of Alexander’s commentary in the Latin tradition of the Posterior Analytics.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CORBINI 2021 articolo SA45.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
970.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
970.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.