This paper intends to highlight the few similarities and the many differences between the myth of the origins contained in Plato’s Protagoras (320c-322d) and the one that Aelius Aristides narrates in the First Platonic Discourse (2. 395-399), in order to show how Aristides’ rewriting of the myth fully reflects the expectations of the society of his time. In his «invention» of the myth of the origins, Aristides in fact recounts how cities came into being for the first time, projecting into the past of the myth those conditions of religious, political and social hierarchies and above all that triumph of rhetoric, with which imperial Greece, or at least a significant part of it, can identify and recognise itself.
Quando gli uomini perivano in silenzio: Elio Aristide e il mito delle origini
E. Berardi
2021-01-01
Abstract
This paper intends to highlight the few similarities and the many differences between the myth of the origins contained in Plato’s Protagoras (320c-322d) and the one that Aelius Aristides narrates in the First Platonic Discourse (2. 395-399), in order to show how Aristides’ rewriting of the myth fully reflects the expectations of the society of his time. In his «invention» of the myth of the origins, Aristides in fact recounts how cities came into being for the first time, projecting into the past of the myth those conditions of religious, political and social hierarchies and above all that triumph of rhetoric, with which imperial Greece, or at least a significant part of it, can identify and recognise itself.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
QRO 2021 Berardi.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
507.41 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
507.41 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.