This chapter charts convergence and divergences in the approaches to liability from procedurally illegal decisions or omissions followed. It focuses on three aspects relevant in assessing if, and to what extent, the jurisdictions analysed are converging beyond the widespread acceptance of governmental liability for illegal decisions or omissions. The first aspect investigated is whether annulment or other specific administrative law remedies must be sought before (or along with) damages.
Concluding remarks: Towards Convergence? The Road beyond Institutional and Doctrinal Path-Dependance
Roberto Caranta
2020-01-01
Abstract
This chapter charts convergence and divergences in the approaches to liability from procedurally illegal decisions or omissions followed. It focuses on three aspects relevant in assessing if, and to what extent, the jurisdictions analysed are converging beyond the widespread acceptance of governmental liability for illegal decisions or omissions. The first aspect investigated is whether annulment or other specific administrative law remedies must be sought before (or along with) damages.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cananea_Tort_Liability_edited_Ch20.docx
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
105.62 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
105.62 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
