Background: Global assessment of antimicrobial agents prescribed to infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Methods: We conducted a one-day global point prevalence study of all antimicrobials provided to NICU infants. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were obtained including NICU level, census, birth weight, gestational/chronologic age, diagnoses, antimicrobial therapy (reason for use; length of therapy), antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), and 30-day in-hospital mortality. Findings: On July 1, 2019, 26% of infants (580/2,265; range, 0–100%; median gestational age, 33 weeks; median birth weight, 1800 g) in 84 NICUs (51, high-income; 33, low-to-middle income) from 29 countries (14, high-income; 15, low-to-middle income) in five continents received ≥1 antimicrobial agent (92%, antibacterial; 19%, antifungal; 4%, antiviral). The most common reasons for antibiotic therapy were “rule-out” sepsis (32%) and “culture-negative” sepsis (16%) with ampicillin (40%), gentamicin (35%), amikacin (19%), vancomycin (15%), and meropenem (9%) used most frequently. For definitive treatment of presumed/confirmed infection, vancomycin (26%), amikacin (20%), and meropenem (16%) were the most prescribed agents. Length of therapy for culture-positive and “culture-negative” infections was 12 days (median; IQR, 8–14) and 7 days (median; IQR, 5–10), respectively. Mortality was 6% (42%, infection-related). An NICU ASP was associated with lower rate of antibiotic utilization (p = 0·02). Interpretation: Global NICU antibiotic use was frequent and prolonged regardless of culture results. NICU-specific ASPs were associated with lower antibiotic utilization rates, suggesting the need for their implementation worldwide. Funding: Merck & Co.; The Ohio State University College of Medicine Barnes Medical Student Research Scholarship

A global point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use in neonatal intensive care units: The no-more-antibiotics and resistance (NO-MAS-R) study

Manzoni P.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background: Global assessment of antimicrobial agents prescribed to infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Methods: We conducted a one-day global point prevalence study of all antimicrobials provided to NICU infants. Demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were obtained including NICU level, census, birth weight, gestational/chronologic age, diagnoses, antimicrobial therapy (reason for use; length of therapy), antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), and 30-day in-hospital mortality. Findings: On July 1, 2019, 26% of infants (580/2,265; range, 0–100%; median gestational age, 33 weeks; median birth weight, 1800 g) in 84 NICUs (51, high-income; 33, low-to-middle income) from 29 countries (14, high-income; 15, low-to-middle income) in five continents received ≥1 antimicrobial agent (92%, antibacterial; 19%, antifungal; 4%, antiviral). The most common reasons for antibiotic therapy were “rule-out” sepsis (32%) and “culture-negative” sepsis (16%) with ampicillin (40%), gentamicin (35%), amikacin (19%), vancomycin (15%), and meropenem (9%) used most frequently. For definitive treatment of presumed/confirmed infection, vancomycin (26%), amikacin (20%), and meropenem (16%) were the most prescribed agents. Length of therapy for culture-positive and “culture-negative” infections was 12 days (median; IQR, 8–14) and 7 days (median; IQR, 5–10), respectively. Mortality was 6% (42%, infection-related). An NICU ASP was associated with lower rate of antibiotic utilization (p = 0·02). Interpretation: Global NICU antibiotic use was frequent and prolonged regardless of culture results. NICU-specific ASPs were associated with lower antibiotic utilization rates, suggesting the need for their implementation worldwide. Funding: Merck & Co.; The Ohio State University College of Medicine Barnes Medical Student Research Scholarship
2021
32
2
1
12
https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.bibliopass.unito.it/pmc/articles/PMC7848759/
https://www-sciencedirect-com.bibliopass.unito.it/science/article/pii/S2589537021000079?via=ihub
Antibiotics; Antifungal; Global point prevalence study; Neonatal antimicrobial stewardship; Neonatal infection
Prusakov P.; Goff D.A.; Wozniak P.S.; Cassim A.; Scipion C.E.A.; Urzua S.; Ronchi A.; Zeng L.; Ladipo-Ajayi O.; Aviles-Otero N.; Udeigwe-Okeke C.R.; Melamed R.; Silveira R.C.; Auriti C.; Beltran-Arroyave C.; Zamora-Flores E.; Sanchez-Codez M.; Donkor E.S.; Kekomaki S.; Mainini N.; Trochez R.V.; Casey J.; Graus J.M.; Muller M.; Singh S.; Loeffen Y.; Perez M.E.T.; Ferreyra G.I.; Lima-Rogel V.; Perrone B.; Izquierdo G.; Cernada M.; Stoffella S.; Ekenze S.O.; de Alba-Romero C.; Tzialla C.; Pham J.T.; Hosoi K.; Consuegra M.C.C.; Betta P.; Hoyos O.A.; Roilides E.; Naranjo-Zuniga G.; Oshiro M.; Garay V.; Mondi V.; Mazzeo D.; Stahl J.A.; Cantey J.B.; Monsalve J.G.M.; Normann E.; Landgrave L.C.; Mazouri A.; Avila C.A.; Piersigilli F.; Trujillo M.; Kolman S.; Delgado V.; Guzman V.; Abdellatif M.; Monterrosa L.; Tina L.G.; Yunis K.; Rodriguez M.A.B.; Saux N.L.; Leonardi V.; Porta A.; Latorre G.; Nakanishi H.; Meir M.; Manzoni P.; Norero X.; Hoyos A.; Arias D.; Sanchez R.G.; Medoro A.K.; Sanchez P.J.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1838105
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact