The essay seeks to inquire into the ownership of war booty in Roman Law. It expresses the thesis that in the archaic period it had no ownership because the res hostium were ownership of the conqueror; in the republican period res hostium were no longer of the conqueror but each soldier was obliged to deposit what torn from the enemy off: the commander would have decided about the ownership of what was included in the booty; during the Empire the booty was a property of the res publica
Sul regime proprietario del bottino di guerra mobiliare
BARBATI S
2016-01-01
Abstract
The essay seeks to inquire into the ownership of war booty in Roman Law. It expresses the thesis that in the archaic period it had no ownership because the res hostium were ownership of the conqueror; in the republican period res hostium were no longer of the conqueror but each soldier was obliged to deposit what torn from the enemy off: the commander would have decided about the ownership of what was included in the booty; during the Empire the booty was a property of the res publica
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
regime proprietario preda bellica 2016.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
385.02 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
385.02 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
