Background: Intraoral scanners (IOS) are widely used in prosthodontics. However, a good trueness is mandatory to achieve optimal clinical results. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare two IOS considering the operator’s experience and different implant clinical scenarios. (2) Methods: Two IOS (IT—Itero, Align Technology; and OS—Opera MC, Opera System, Monaco) were compared simulating three different clinical scenarios: Single implant, two implants, and full-arch rehabilitation. Ten scans were taken for each configuration by two different operators (one expert, one inexperienced); influence of operator experience and the type of scanner used was investigated. (3) Results: Trueness of the scans differed between the experienced and nonexperienced operator and this difference was statistically significant in all the three scenarios (p = 0.000–0.001, 0.037). A significant difference was present between the scanners (p = 0.000), in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios (p = 0.00). (4) Conclusions: Experience of the operator significantly affect trueness of IT and OP scanners. A statistically significant difference was present among IOS in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios.

Trueness of intraoral scanners in implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro analysis on the effect of operators’ experience and implant number

Pera, Francesco;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background: Intraoral scanners (IOS) are widely used in prosthodontics. However, a good trueness is mandatory to achieve optimal clinical results. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare two IOS considering the operator’s experience and different implant clinical scenarios. (2) Methods: Two IOS (IT—Itero, Align Technology; and OS—Opera MC, Opera System, Monaco) were compared simulating three different clinical scenarios: Single implant, two implants, and full-arch rehabilitation. Ten scans were taken for each configuration by two different operators (one expert, one inexperienced); influence of operator experience and the type of scanner used was investigated. (3) Results: Trueness of the scans differed between the experienced and nonexperienced operator and this difference was statistically significant in all the three scenarios (p = 0.000–0.001, 0.037). A significant difference was present between the scanners (p = 0.000), in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios (p = 0.00). (4) Conclusions: Experience of the operator significantly affect trueness of IT and OP scanners. A statistically significant difference was present among IOS in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios.
2021
10
24
5917
5922
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/24/5917
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706214/
Dental implants; Digital impression; Intraoral scanner
Pesce, Paolo; Bagnasco, Francesco; Pancini, Nicolò; Colombo, Marco; Canullo, Luigi; Pera, Francesco; Bressan, Eriberto; Annunziata, Marco; Menini, Maria
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jcm-10-05917-v3.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: jcm-10-05917-v3
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 516.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
516.08 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1844466
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact