The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR)-method is one of the most popular procedures used in the managerial context to incorporate downside risk into capital budgeting modelling. The RADR-method consists of discounting the project stream of future inflows at the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR), a rate that is usually higher than the firm's corporate cost of capital. We show that the Modified Duration, a volatility measure used in the fixed income market, that summarizes in a single number the bi-dimensional information about the inflows and terms in which they are charged, gives a primary key in the NPV reduction. An alternative method used in academia is the Expected net Present Value (EPV) method. Through decision-makers’ assessments on the potential losses and their probability of occurrence, we identify the proper RADR that leads the same NPV risk-adjustments, whichever method is used. Our results are useful to provide decision-makers a better awareness as to how to select the proper RADR by reducing the subjectivity and increasing financial precision based on Modified Duration, thus providing an alternative to the norm.

One-size Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate does not fit all risky projects

Tibiletti, Luisa
First
Membro del Collaboration Group
2022-01-01

Abstract

The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR)-method is one of the most popular procedures used in the managerial context to incorporate downside risk into capital budgeting modelling. The RADR-method consists of discounting the project stream of future inflows at the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR), a rate that is usually higher than the firm's corporate cost of capital. We show that the Modified Duration, a volatility measure used in the fixed income market, that summarizes in a single number the bi-dimensional information about the inflows and terms in which they are charged, gives a primary key in the NPV reduction. An alternative method used in academia is the Expected net Present Value (EPV) method. Through decision-makers’ assessments on the potential losses and their probability of occurrence, we identify the proper RADR that leads the same NPV risk-adjustments, whichever method is used. Our results are useful to provide decision-makers a better awareness as to how to select the proper RADR by reducing the subjectivity and increasing financial precision based on Modified Duration, thus providing an alternative to the norm.
2022
3
3
289
302
https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-03-2021-0035
Downside scenario, Expected Present Value (EPV), Modified Duration, Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR), Risk Premium
Tibiletti, Luisa
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JRF 2022 TIBILETTI-1.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 210.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
210.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
10-1108_JRF-03-2021-0035.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 144.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
144.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1848013
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact