Objective: To update the analysis of mortality of a cohort of dyestuff workers, in northern Italy, heavily exposed to carcinogenic aromatic amines. Methods: We updated to 2018 overall and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of 590 male workers heavily exposed to carcinogenic aromatic amines in a dyestuff factory from 1922 to 1972. Workers were censored at age 85. Expected cases for the period 1946-2018 were computed using Piedmont mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were computed. Results: Between 1946 and 2018, 470 deaths were reported. The overall SMR from all causes was 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-1.74) and the SMR from all cancers was 2.05 (95% CI = 1.77-2.37); compared to a previous report, there were 4 additional deaths from bladder cancer, for a total of 60 deaths compared with 4.0 expected (SMR 14.86, 95% CI 11.34-19.12). The SMR for bladder can-cer increased with younger age at first exposure and longer duration of exposure, while it decreased with time since last exposure, albeit it was still 3.5, 30, or more years since last exposure. An increased risk was observed among workers exposed to fuchsine or ortho-toluidine (SMR=16.3; 95% CI = 6.0-35.5). Conclusions: This 73-year follow-up confirms the results from previous analyses, with increased overall mortality, and increased mortality from all cancers and especially for bladder cancer. The excess risk of bladder cancer persisted several decades after stopping exposure.

Mortality from bladder cancer in dyestuff workers exposed to aromatic amines: A 73-year follow-up

Catalina Ciocan
First
;
Alessandro Godono;Enrico Pira
Last
2022-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To update the analysis of mortality of a cohort of dyestuff workers, in northern Italy, heavily exposed to carcinogenic aromatic amines. Methods: We updated to 2018 overall and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of 590 male workers heavily exposed to carcinogenic aromatic amines in a dyestuff factory from 1922 to 1972. Workers were censored at age 85. Expected cases for the period 1946-2018 were computed using Piedmont mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were computed. Results: Between 1946 and 2018, 470 deaths were reported. The overall SMR from all causes was 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-1.74) and the SMR from all cancers was 2.05 (95% CI = 1.77-2.37); compared to a previous report, there were 4 additional deaths from bladder cancer, for a total of 60 deaths compared with 4.0 expected (SMR 14.86, 95% CI 11.34-19.12). The SMR for bladder can-cer increased with younger age at first exposure and longer duration of exposure, while it decreased with time since last exposure, albeit it was still 3.5, 30, or more years since last exposure. An increased risk was observed among workers exposed to fuchsine or ortho-toluidine (SMR=16.3; 95% CI = 6.0-35.5). Conclusions: This 73-year follow-up confirms the results from previous analyses, with increased overall mortality, and increased mortality from all cancers and especially for bladder cancer. The excess risk of bladder cancer persisted several decades after stopping exposure.
2022
113
2
1
7
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360263480_Mortality_from_bladder_cancer_in_dyestuff_workers_exposed_to_aromatic_amines_A_73-year_follow-up
https://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/lamedicinadellavoro/article/view/12893/10607
Aromatic amines; bladder cancer; dyestuff
Catalina Ciocan, Alessandro Godono, Nicolò Franco, Carlo La Vecchia, Eva Negri, Paolo Boffetta, Enrico Pira
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ciocan C, Med lav, 2022_IPCA.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 115.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
115.63 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1858001
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact