Background and Objectives: Adenocarcinoma patterns could be grouped based on clinical behaviors: low- (lepidic), intermediate- (papillary or acinar), and high-grade (micropapillary and solid). We analyzed the impact of the second predominant pattern (SPP) on disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: We retrospectively collected data of surgically resected stage I and II adenocarcinoma. Selection criteria: anatomical resection with lymphadenectomy and pathological N0. Pure adenocarcinomas and mucinous subtypes were excluded. Recurrence rate and factors affecting DFS were analyzed according to the SPP focusing on intermediate-grade predominant pattern adenocarcinomas. Results: Among 270 patients, 55% were male. The mean age was 68.3 years. SPP pattern appeared as follows: lepidic 43.0%, papillary 23.0%, solid 14.4%, acinar 11.9%, and micropapillary 7.8%. The recurrence rate was 21.5% and 5-year DFS was 71.1%. No difference in DFS was found according to SPP (p =.522). In patients with high-grade SPP, the percentage of SPP, age, and tumor size significantly influenced DFS (p =.016). In patients with lepidic SPP, size, male gender, and lymph-node sampling (p =.005; p =.014; p =.038, respectively) significantly influenced DFS. Conclusions: The impact of SPP on DFS is not homogeneous in a subset of patients with the intermediate-grade predominant patterns. The influence of high-grade SPP on DFS is related to its proportion in the tumor.

Prognostic impact of lung adenocarcinoma second predominant pattern from a large European database

Guerrera F.;Femia F.;Ruffini E.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Adenocarcinoma patterns could be grouped based on clinical behaviors: low- (lepidic), intermediate- (papillary or acinar), and high-grade (micropapillary and solid). We analyzed the impact of the second predominant pattern (SPP) on disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: We retrospectively collected data of surgically resected stage I and II adenocarcinoma. Selection criteria: anatomical resection with lymphadenectomy and pathological N0. Pure adenocarcinomas and mucinous subtypes were excluded. Recurrence rate and factors affecting DFS were analyzed according to the SPP focusing on intermediate-grade predominant pattern adenocarcinomas. Results: Among 270 patients, 55% were male. The mean age was 68.3 years. SPP pattern appeared as follows: lepidic 43.0%, papillary 23.0%, solid 14.4%, acinar 11.9%, and micropapillary 7.8%. The recurrence rate was 21.5% and 5-year DFS was 71.1%. No difference in DFS was found according to SPP (p =.522). In patients with high-grade SPP, the percentage of SPP, age, and tumor size significantly influenced DFS (p =.016). In patients with lepidic SPP, size, male gender, and lymph-node sampling (p =.005; p =.014; p =.038, respectively) significantly influenced DFS. Conclusions: The impact of SPP on DFS is not homogeneous in a subset of patients with the intermediate-grade predominant patterns. The influence of high-grade SPP on DFS is related to its proportion in the tumor.
2021
123
2
560
569
lung adenocarcinoma; lung cancer biology; lung cancer surgery; non-small-cell lung cancer; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Adenocarcinoma, Papillary; Aged; Carcinoma, Acinar Cell; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Databases, Factual
Bertoglio P.; Querzoli G.; Ventura L.; Aprile V.; Cattoni M.A.; Nachira D.; Lococo F.; Rodriguez Perez M.; Guerrera F.; Minervini F.; Gnetti L.; Bacch...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Journal of Surgical Oncology - 2020 - Bertoglio - Prognostic impact of lung adenocarcinoma second predominant pattern from.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.38 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1858703
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact