Deaths due to hypertensive crisis can be unexplained because of the impossibility to identify—before the decease—the specific cause of the crisis. In these cases, autopsy and microscopic examinations are needed. It can happen that the request to conduct these examinations can be submitted to forensic pathologists by prosecutors to ascertain medical malpractice claims. Indeed, we report the case of a 36-year-old woman who died after a minimally invasive medical procedure because of the occurrence of a severe hypertensive crisis. After death, the woman's relatives raised formal complaint for medical malpractice. For this reason, the prosecutor ordered to perform an autopsy. Examining the abdominal cavity, the forensic pathologists identified the left adrenal gland as expanded; in correspondence with organ's medulla, there was a gray and noncapsulated mass. Immunohistochemistry was performed: the microscopic samples were diffusely positive for chromogranin A, suggesting the diagnosis of a subclinical pheochromocytoma. In light of the above, medical malpractice was excluded. This case highlights that forensic pathologists should be aware that, in case of unexpected deaths due to hypertensive crisis, adrenal glands should be always accurately evaluated, performing specific immunohistochemistry study to exclude the presence of a pheochromocytoma.

An Unexpected Death Due to a Subclinical Pheochromocytoma After an Induced Abortion

Lupariello F.
First
;
Mirri F.;Davico L.;Di Vella G.
Last
2022-01-01

Abstract

Deaths due to hypertensive crisis can be unexplained because of the impossibility to identify—before the decease—the specific cause of the crisis. In these cases, autopsy and microscopic examinations are needed. It can happen that the request to conduct these examinations can be submitted to forensic pathologists by prosecutors to ascertain medical malpractice claims. Indeed, we report the case of a 36-year-old woman who died after a minimally invasive medical procedure because of the occurrence of a severe hypertensive crisis. After death, the woman's relatives raised formal complaint for medical malpractice. For this reason, the prosecutor ordered to perform an autopsy. Examining the abdominal cavity, the forensic pathologists identified the left adrenal gland as expanded; in correspondence with organ's medulla, there was a gray and noncapsulated mass. Immunohistochemistry was performed: the microscopic samples were diffusely positive for chromogranin A, suggesting the diagnosis of a subclinical pheochromocytoma. In light of the above, medical malpractice was excluded. This case highlights that forensic pathologists should be aware that, in case of unexpected deaths due to hypertensive crisis, adrenal glands should be always accurately evaluated, performing specific immunohistochemistry study to exclude the presence of a pheochromocytoma.
2022
43
4
376
379
https://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2022&issue=12000&article=00014&type=Fulltext
autopsy, forensic, hypertensive crisis, medical malpractice, pheochromocytoma, unexpected death
Lupariello F., Mirri F., Davico L., Di Vella G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AJFMP 2022.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 547.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
547.75 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1867999
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact