Since Saul Kripke’s influential work in the 1970s, the revisionary approach to semantic paradox—the idea that semantic paradoxes must be solved by weakening classical logic—has been increasingly popular. In this paper, we present a new revenge argument to the effect that the main revisionary approaches breed new paradoxes that they are unable to block.
Generalised revenge
Rossi L
2020-01-01
Abstract
Since Saul Kripke’s influential work in the 1970s, the revisionary approach to semantic paradox—the idea that semantic paradoxes must be solved by weakening classical logic—has been increasingly popular. In this paper, we present a new revenge argument to the effect that the main revisionary approaches breed new paradoxes that they are unable to block.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Generalized Revenge.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
2.97 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.97 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
