The increasing average age emphasizes the importance of gait analysis in elderly populations. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) represent a suitable wearable technology for the characterization of gait by estimating spatio-temporal parameters (STPs). However, the location of inertial sensors on the human body and the associated algorithms for the estimation of gait STPs play a fundamental role and are still open challenges. Accordingly, the aim of this work was to compare three IMUs set-ups (trunk, shanks, and ankles) and correspondent algorithms to a gold standard optoelectronic system for the estimation of gait STPs in a healthy elderly population. In total, 14 healthy elderly subjects walked barefoot at three different speeds. Gait parameters were assessed for each IMUs set-up and compared to those estimated with the gold standard. A statistical analysis based on Pearson correlation, Root Mean Square Error and Bland Altman plots was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of IMUs. Even though all tested set-ups produced accurate results, the IMU on the trunk performed better in terms of correlation (R ≥ 0.8), RMSE (0.01-0.06 s for temporal parameters, 0.03-0.04 for the limp index), and level of agreement (-0.01 s ≤ mean error ≤ 0.01 s, -0.02 s ≤ standard deviation error ≤ 0.02 s), also allowing simpler preparation of subjects and minor encumbrance during gait. From the promising results, a similar experiment might be conducted in pathological populations in the attempt to verify the accuracy of IMUs set-ups and algorithms also in non-physiological patterns.

Comparison of IMU set-ups for the estimation of gait spatio-temporal parameters in an elderly population

Elisa Panero;
2022-01-01

Abstract

The increasing average age emphasizes the importance of gait analysis in elderly populations. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) represent a suitable wearable technology for the characterization of gait by estimating spatio-temporal parameters (STPs). However, the location of inertial sensors on the human body and the associated algorithms for the estimation of gait STPs play a fundamental role and are still open challenges. Accordingly, the aim of this work was to compare three IMUs set-ups (trunk, shanks, and ankles) and correspondent algorithms to a gold standard optoelectronic system for the estimation of gait STPs in a healthy elderly population. In total, 14 healthy elderly subjects walked barefoot at three different speeds. Gait parameters were assessed for each IMUs set-up and compared to those estimated with the gold standard. A statistical analysis based on Pearson correlation, Root Mean Square Error and Bland Altman plots was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of IMUs. Even though all tested set-ups produced accurate results, the IMU on the trunk performed better in terms of correlation (R ≥ 0.8), RMSE (0.01-0.06 s for temporal parameters, 0.03-0.04 for the limp index), and level of agreement (-0.01 s ≤ mean error ≤ 0.01 s, -0.02 s ≤ standard deviation error ≤ 0.02 s), also allowing simpler preparation of subjects and minor encumbrance during gait. From the promising results, a similar experiment might be conducted in pathological populations in the attempt to verify the accuracy of IMUs set-ups and algorithms also in non-physiological patterns.
2022
237
1
61
73
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09544119221135051
Gait; accuracy; healthy elderly population; inertial sensors; spatio-temporal parameters
Elisa Digo; Elisa Panero; Valentina Agostini; Laura Gastaldi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
09544119221135051.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 5.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.83 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2022_Digo_Comparison of IMU set ups for the estimation of gait spatio temporal parameters in an elderly population.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 230.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
230.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1885738
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact