BACKGROUND: A standard tool to assess patients' knowledge about gluten and the gluten-free diet (GFD) is lacking. METHODS: We aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess GFD knowledge. A 10-point questionnaire (GLU10) covering different aspects of knowledge about gluten content in food/non-food products and the gluten-free living was developed. To validate this questionnaire, it was administered to adult celiac patients already instructed on gluten and the GFD and non-celiac controls. Patients were prospectively recruited at our Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic between August 2020 and February 2021. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients (52 celiac patients and 54 controls) participated in the validation phase. Celiac patients scored significantly higher than controls on the GLU10 Questionnaire (median 6 points vs. 2 points, P<0.001). Higher self-reported knowledge of the GFD was related to a higher score (P<0.001). ROC curve confirmed the ability of the GLU10 Questionnaire to discriminate between subjects with good and poor GFD knowledge (AUC=0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98). A score of 5 was identified as the best cut-off (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 94.4%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, being a celiac patient (P<0.001) and having a university degree (P=0.04) were associated to a high GLU10 Score (>= 5). CONCLUSIONS: GLU10 is the first validated questionnaire for assessing knowledge of a GFD in celiac patients and the general population. (Cite this article as: Vernero M, Schiepatti A, Maimaris S, Lusetti F, Scalvini D, Megang F, et al. The GLU-10: a validated ten-point score to identify poorly instructed celiac patients in need of dietary interventions. Minerva Gastroenterol 2022;68:91-7. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5985.21.03037-0)

The GLU-10: a validated ten-point score to identify poorly instructed celiac patients in need of dietary interventions

Vernero, Marta
First
;
Biagi, Federico
2022-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A standard tool to assess patients' knowledge about gluten and the gluten-free diet (GFD) is lacking. METHODS: We aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess GFD knowledge. A 10-point questionnaire (GLU10) covering different aspects of knowledge about gluten content in food/non-food products and the gluten-free living was developed. To validate this questionnaire, it was administered to adult celiac patients already instructed on gluten and the GFD and non-celiac controls. Patients were prospectively recruited at our Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic between August 2020 and February 2021. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients (52 celiac patients and 54 controls) participated in the validation phase. Celiac patients scored significantly higher than controls on the GLU10 Questionnaire (median 6 points vs. 2 points, P<0.001). Higher self-reported knowledge of the GFD was related to a higher score (P<0.001). ROC curve confirmed the ability of the GLU10 Questionnaire to discriminate between subjects with good and poor GFD knowledge (AUC=0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98). A score of 5 was identified as the best cut-off (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 94.4%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, being a celiac patient (P<0.001) and having a university degree (P=0.04) were associated to a high GLU10 Score (>= 5). CONCLUSIONS: GLU10 is the first validated questionnaire for assessing knowledge of a GFD in celiac patients and the general population. (Cite this article as: Vernero M, Schiepatti A, Maimaris S, Lusetti F, Scalvini D, Megang F, et al. The GLU-10: a validated ten-point score to identify poorly instructed celiac patients in need of dietary interventions. Minerva Gastroenterol 2022;68:91-7. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5985.21.03037-0)
2022
68
1
91
97
Diet; gluten-free; Glutens; Surveys and questionnaires; Celiac disease; Knowledge
Vernero, Marta; Schiepatti, Annalisa; Maimaris, Stiliano; Lusetti, Francesca; Scalvini, Davide; Megang, Fabiola; Nicolardi, Maria L; Gabrielli, Gian M...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1886543
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact