The aim of this paper is to describe a technique for sinus floor augmentation with a 1-step crestal approach where the residual bone is ≤ 7.5mm. 36 implants were installed in 25 patients in the atrophic posterior maxilla immediately after sinus floor elevation. Sinus floor elevation was performed with a crestal approach using either osteotomes and burs or piezosurgery. Standardized intraoral radiographs were taken prior to surgery and 1 year after surgery. The mean residual bone height was 5.61 mm (range 3-7.5mm). The mean gain of sinus elevation was 6.78 mm (range 3.5-10mm) at 1 year after surgery. Two patients dropped out of the study. Of the 23 patients completing the study, one implant failed, whilst the remaining 33 implants were stable 12 months after surgery (cumulative survival rate 97%). A statistically significantly higher bone height was achieved with tapered implants compared with cylindrical implants (P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in bone level using osteotomes or piezosurgery. Piezosurgery was considered to provide less discomfort for the patient and greater convenience for the surgeon.

Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes or piezoelectric surgery

Pera F;
2011-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe a technique for sinus floor augmentation with a 1-step crestal approach where the residual bone is ≤ 7.5mm. 36 implants were installed in 25 patients in the atrophic posterior maxilla immediately after sinus floor elevation. Sinus floor elevation was performed with a crestal approach using either osteotomes and burs or piezosurgery. Standardized intraoral radiographs were taken prior to surgery and 1 year after surgery. The mean residual bone height was 5.61 mm (range 3-7.5mm). The mean gain of sinus elevation was 6.78 mm (range 3.5-10mm) at 1 year after surgery. Two patients dropped out of the study. Of the 23 patients completing the study, one implant failed, whilst the remaining 33 implants were stable 12 months after surgery (cumulative survival rate 97%). A statistically significantly higher bone height was achieved with tapered implants compared with cylindrical implants (P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in bone level using osteotomes or piezosurgery. Piezosurgery was considered to provide less discomfort for the patient and greater convenience for the surgeon.
2011
40
5
497
503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.01.006
SURFACED DENTAL IMPLANTS; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; SIMULTANEOUS PLACEMENT; ORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Baldi D; Menini M; Pera F; Ravera G; Pera P
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2011baldiijoms.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 286.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
286.32 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1888871
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact