: Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular Carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and Daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In the attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd vs KRd was similar in terms of overall response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, p=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, p=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs 22.5 months; p=0.028). DaraRd was better tolerated, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, p.

Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis

Mina, Roberto;
2022-01-01

Abstract

: Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular Carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and Daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In the attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd vs KRd was similar in terms of overall response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, p=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, p=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs 22.5 months; p=0.028). DaraRd was better tolerated, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, p.
2022
108
3
833
842
https://haematologica.org/article/view/haematol.2022.281342
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.281342
Mangiacavalli, Silvia; Cartia, Claudio Salvatore; Galli, Monica; Pezzatti, Sara; Belotti, Angelo; Fazio, Francesca; Mina, Roberto; Marcatti, Magda; Ca...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
[Published Vsn] Mangiacavalli et al - 2022 - Haematologica - Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Published version. Mangiacavalli S, Cartia CS, Galli M, Pezzatti S, Belotti A, Fazio F, Mina R, Marcatti M, Cafro A, Zambello R, Paris L, Barilà G, Olivares C, Pompa A, Mazza R, Farina F, Soldarini M, Benvenuti P, Pagani G, Palumbo M, Masoni V, Ferretti VV, Klersy C, Arcaini L, Petrucci MT. Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis. Haematologica. 2022 Oct 6. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.281342. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36200419. Copyright (c) 2022 Ferrata Storti Foundation. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Available at: https://haematologica.org/article/view/haematol.2022.281342 | https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.281342
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 4.98 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.98 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1890112
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact