This contribution deals with the topic of power relations between genders, starting from the discursive practices which describe and connote such relationality, as developed within the legal space. In particular, we will assess the impact of gender stereotypes in addressing and determining judicial practices and the work of jurists, contributing to the phenomenon of epistemic injustice, as defined by Miranda Fricker. A recent judgement on the subject of sexual violence will therefore be considered in order to highlight the discriminatory effects produced by stereotypes, which consist of a systematic devaluation of the word of the women victims, who are thus deprived of decisional autonomy, discredited and silenced in their demands of justice. Investigating the operating methods of this mechanism, starting from the judgements that carry out these discriminatory forms, then allows us to become aware of a phenomenon that is both harmful and unjustified, in order to curb its incidence and to activate so that our relations in common are oriented towards a different direction: equal and concretely respectful of differences.

“Lasciando aperta la porta”. Quando gli stereotipi entrano in tribunale

Maria Borrello
2022-01-01

Abstract

This contribution deals with the topic of power relations between genders, starting from the discursive practices which describe and connote such relationality, as developed within the legal space. In particular, we will assess the impact of gender stereotypes in addressing and determining judicial practices and the work of jurists, contributing to the phenomenon of epistemic injustice, as defined by Miranda Fricker. A recent judgement on the subject of sexual violence will therefore be considered in order to highlight the discriminatory effects produced by stereotypes, which consist of a systematic devaluation of the word of the women victims, who are thus deprived of decisional autonomy, discredited and silenced in their demands of justice. Investigating the operating methods of this mechanism, starting from the judgements that carry out these discriminatory forms, then allows us to become aware of a phenomenon that is both harmful and unjustified, in order to curb its incidence and to activate so that our relations in common are oriented towards a different direction: equal and concretely respectful of differences.
2022
VIII
2
353
376
http://ordines.it
gender stereotypes – epistemic injustice – Court judgements – equality – democracy
Maria Borrello
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Borrello-Maria-Lasciando-aperta-la-porta.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 444.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
444.19 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1890584
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact