It has been known that the intrinsic properties of a semiconducting photoanodes significantly influence the overall photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance. Here, we report on the fabrication of layered structure of mixed-phase FeO (wustite), Fe3O4 (magnetite), and alpha-Fe2O3 (hematite) iron oxide nanoflake/nanowire morphologies through the thermal oxidation of pristine Fe foils, and the role of metastable FeO phase on the PEC performance discussed. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopic measurements revealed the variation in phase fraction of wustite, magnetite, and hematite with respect to oxidation temperature. The PEC measurements indicate a dependence of onset potential and photocurrent density on phase proportion. The sample, which contains metastable wustite phase FeO, along with Fe3O4 and alpha-Fe2O3, shows a lower onset and higher photocurrent density, followed by the sample that contains a nearly equal ratio of magnetite to hematite phase (similar to 42:58) than that of relatively higher magnetite phase content samples. It is attributed to the improvement in the intrinsic transport of photogenerated charge carriers from hematite via the magnetite and wustite phases to the back contact of the photoanode. It consequently led to a decrease in bulk charge recombination across the interfaces of multiple phases. We carried out electrochemical impedance (EIS) and light intensity-modulated photocurrent measurements (IMPS) to elucidate the mechanism behind the charge separation across the multiple phases.

Controlling phase fraction and crystal orientation via thermal oxidation of iron foils for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance

Alberto Naldoni;
2020-01-01

Abstract

It has been known that the intrinsic properties of a semiconducting photoanodes significantly influence the overall photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance. Here, we report on the fabrication of layered structure of mixed-phase FeO (wustite), Fe3O4 (magnetite), and alpha-Fe2O3 (hematite) iron oxide nanoflake/nanowire morphologies through the thermal oxidation of pristine Fe foils, and the role of metastable FeO phase on the PEC performance discussed. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopic measurements revealed the variation in phase fraction of wustite, magnetite, and hematite with respect to oxidation temperature. The PEC measurements indicate a dependence of onset potential and photocurrent density on phase proportion. The sample, which contains metastable wustite phase FeO, along with Fe3O4 and alpha-Fe2O3, shows a lower onset and higher photocurrent density, followed by the sample that contains a nearly equal ratio of magnetite to hematite phase (similar to 42:58) than that of relatively higher magnetite phase content samples. It is attributed to the improvement in the intrinsic transport of photogenerated charge carriers from hematite via the magnetite and wustite phases to the back contact of the photoanode. It consequently led to a decrease in bulk charge recombination across the interfaces of multiple phases. We carried out electrochemical impedance (EIS) and light intensity-modulated photocurrent measurements (IMPS) to elucidate the mechanism behind the charge separation across the multiple phases.
2020
Inglese
Esperti anonimi
361
117
123
7
Fe2O3 nanoflakes; Mixed-phase; Charge recombination; Intensity modulated photocurrent spectroscopy (IMPS); Impedance spectroscopy (EIS); PEC water splitting
REPUBBLICA CECA
2 – prodotto con deroga d’ufficio (SOLO se editore non consente/non ha risposto)
262
4
Rambabu Yalavarthi; Alberto Naldoni; Radek Zbořil; Štěpán Kment
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
none
03-CONTRIBUTO IN RIVISTA::03A-Articolo su Rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1892835
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact