The fact that an offense can be committed by artificial intelligence seems to be an oxymoron, at least in a legal system where criminal acts are, by definition, an expression of the personality of a human being. However, reality is knocking on the door of criminal lawyers, challenging them with the possibility that a non-human agent may commit harmful acts that the com munity would want to be punished. This paper questions the prospects of a rational criminal control with respect to acts performed by or through machines and software that learn and evolve by interacting with the environment in which they act.
FLASH OFFENDERS. LE PROSPETTIVE DI ACCOUNTABILITY PENALE NEL CONTRASTO ALLE INTELLIGENZE ARTIFICIALI DEVIANTI
consulich
2022-01-01
Abstract
The fact that an offense can be committed by artificial intelligence seems to be an oxymoron, at least in a legal system where criminal acts are, by definition, an expression of the personality of a human being. However, reality is knocking on the door of criminal lawyers, challenging them with the possibility that a non-human agent may commit harmful acts that the com munity would want to be punished. This paper questions the prospects of a rational criminal control with respect to acts performed by or through machines and software that learn and evolve by interacting with the environment in which they act.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Federico Consulich Flash offenders Riv. it. 3 2022.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
566 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
566 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
