This chapter focuses on the executive advisory and support office (EASO) that is typically found in the political systems of the Napoleonic administrative tradition: the Ministerial Cabinet. In a cross-case comparative endeavour (Belgium, France, Italy, Portugal, Greece, and the European Commission), the chapter challenges the assumption that ministerial advisory offices are similar across cases within the same administrative tradition. Based on in-depth country case analysis, it highlights similarities and differences across cases considering ministerial offices’ origin, formal label, size, role, degree of osmosis with the administration, and the specificities of prime ministers’ offices. It is argued that the term ‘ministerial cabinet’ can be conceptually used to describe a type of EASO that is formally partisan, of a critical size, functionally active in the horizontal, vertical, political, and external arenas, and is in osmosis with the administration in that advisers are able to switch from a civil service position to a ministerial advisory one and vice versa. To test the ‘cabinetisation’ thesis, we conclude that more EASOs should be compared empirically so as to check the extent to which cabinetisation is happening across different politico-administrative traditions.

Ministerial advisers in political systems of the Napoleonic administrative tradition: the ministerial cabinet

Di Mascio, Fabrizio;
2023-01-01

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the executive advisory and support office (EASO) that is typically found in the political systems of the Napoleonic administrative tradition: the Ministerial Cabinet. In a cross-case comparative endeavour (Belgium, France, Italy, Portugal, Greece, and the European Commission), the chapter challenges the assumption that ministerial advisory offices are similar across cases within the same administrative tradition. Based on in-depth country case analysis, it highlights similarities and differences across cases considering ministerial offices’ origin, formal label, size, role, degree of osmosis with the administration, and the specificities of prime ministers’ offices. It is argued that the term ‘ministerial cabinet’ can be conceptually used to describe a type of EASO that is formally partisan, of a critical size, functionally active in the horizontal, vertical, political, and external arenas, and is in osmosis with the administration in that advisers are able to switch from a civil service position to a ministerial advisory one and vice versa. To test the ‘cabinetisation’ thesis, we conclude that more EASOs should be compared empirically so as to check the extent to which cabinetisation is happening across different politico-administrative traditions.
2023
Handbook on Ministerial and Political Advisers
Edward Elgar
232
250
9781800886582
9781800886575
9781800886582
https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781800886582/book-part-9781800886582-26.xml?rskey=v0THHy&result=5
Administrative tradition; Napoleonic tradition; Historical institutionalism; Policy Advice
Meert, Arthur; Brans, Marleen; Di Mascio, Fabrizio; Gouglas, Athanassios; Natalini, Alessandro; Silva, Patrícia
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
9781800886582-Chapter 16.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 325.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
325.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1914190
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact