Introduction: In recent decades, new virtual reality (VR)-based protocols have been proposed for the rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN), a debilitating disorder of spatial awareness. However, it remains unclear which type of VR protocol and level of VR immersion can maximize the clinical benefits. To answer these questions, we conducted a systematic review of the use of VR for the rehabilitation of USN. Method: Studies between 2000 and 2022 that met the inclusion criteria were classified according to their research design and degree of immersion (non-immersive, NIVR; semi-immersive, SIVR; immersive, IVR). Results: A total of 375 studies were identified, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria. Improvements were found in 84.6% of the reviewed studies: 85.7% used NIVR, 100% used SIVR and 55.6% used IVR. However, only 42.3% of them included a control group and only 19.2% were randomized control trials (RCT). Conclusion: VR protocols may offer new opportunities for USN rehabilitation, although further RCTs are needed to validate their clinical efficacy.

Virtual reality rehabilitation for unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review of immersive, semi-immersive and non-immersive techniques

Salatino, Adriana
First
;
Zavattaro, Claudio;Gammeri, Roberto;Cirillo, Emanuele;Pyasik, Maria;Serra, Hilary;Pia, Lorenzo;Geminiani, Giuliano;Ricci, Raffaella
Last
2023-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, new virtual reality (VR)-based protocols have been proposed for the rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN), a debilitating disorder of spatial awareness. However, it remains unclear which type of VR protocol and level of VR immersion can maximize the clinical benefits. To answer these questions, we conducted a systematic review of the use of VR for the rehabilitation of USN. Method: Studies between 2000 and 2022 that met the inclusion criteria were classified according to their research design and degree of immersion (non-immersive, NIVR; semi-immersive, SIVR; immersive, IVR). Results: A total of 375 studies were identified, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria. Improvements were found in 84.6% of the reviewed studies: 85.7% used NIVR, 100% used SIVR and 55.6% used IVR. However, only 42.3% of them included a control group and only 19.2% were randomized control trials (RCT). Conclusion: VR protocols may offer new opportunities for USN rehabilitation, although further RCTs are needed to validate their clinical efficacy.
2023
152
105248-
1
21
Rehabilitation; Stroke; Unilateral spatial neglect; Video games; Virtual reality
Salatino, Adriana; Zavattaro, Claudio; Gammeri, Roberto; Cirillo, Emanuele; Piatti, Maria Luisa; Pyasik, Maria; Serra, Hilary; Pia, Lorenzo; Geminiani, Giuliano; Ricci, Raffaella
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1914715
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact