Objective: To develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and trials, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR. Methods: This international multidisciplinary initiative included 4 phases: 1) Phase I, criteria generation by surveys and literature review; 2) Phase II, criteria reduction by modified Delphi and nominal group technique exercises; 3) Phase III, criteria definition, further reduction with the guidance of real-world patient scenarios, and weighting via consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis, and threshold identification; and 4) Phase IV, validation using independent adjudicators' consensus as the gold standard. Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria include an entry criterion of at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of identification of an aPL-associated clinical criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria (score range 1-7 points each) clustered into 6 clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic) and 2 laboratory domains (lupus anticoagulant functional coagulation assays, and solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2 -glycoprotein I antibodies). Patients accumulating at least 3 points each from the clinical and laboratory domains are classified as having APS. In the validation cohort, the new APS criteria versus the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria had a specificity of 99% versus 86%, and a sensitivity of 84% versus 99%. Conclusion: These new ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary international input. Hierarchically clustered, weighted, and risk-stratified criteria reflect the current thinking about APS, providing high specificity and a strong foundation for future APS research.

The 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria

Sciascia, Savino;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and trials, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR. Methods: This international multidisciplinary initiative included 4 phases: 1) Phase I, criteria generation by surveys and literature review; 2) Phase II, criteria reduction by modified Delphi and nominal group technique exercises; 3) Phase III, criteria definition, further reduction with the guidance of real-world patient scenarios, and weighting via consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis, and threshold identification; and 4) Phase IV, validation using independent adjudicators' consensus as the gold standard. Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria include an entry criterion of at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of identification of an aPL-associated clinical criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria (score range 1-7 points each) clustered into 6 clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic) and 2 laboratory domains (lupus anticoagulant functional coagulation assays, and solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2 -glycoprotein I antibodies). Patients accumulating at least 3 points each from the clinical and laboratory domains are classified as having APS. In the validation cohort, the new APS criteria versus the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria had a specificity of 99% versus 86%, and a sensitivity of 84% versus 99%. Conclusion: These new ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary international input. Hierarchically clustered, weighted, and risk-stratified criteria reflect the current thinking about APS, providing high specificity and a strong foundation for future APS research.
2023
75
10
1687
1702
Barbhaiya, Medha; Zuily, Stephane; Naden, Ray; Hendry, Alison; Manneville, Florian; Amigo, Mary-Carmen; Amoura, Zahir; Andrade, Danieli; Andreoli, Laura; Artim-Esen, Bahar; Atsumi, Tatsuya; Avcin, Tadej; Belmont, H Michael; Bertolaccini, Maria Laura; Branch, D Ware; Carvalheiras, Graziela; Casini, Alessandro; Cervera, Ricard; Cohen, Hannah; Costedoat-Chalumeau, Nathalie; Crowther, Mark; de Jesus, Guilherme; Delluc, Aurelien; Desai, Sheetal; De Sancho, Maria; Devreese, Katrien M; Diz-Kucukkaya, Reyhan; Duarte-Garcia, Ali; Frances, Camille; Garcia, David; Gris, Jean-Christophe; Jordan, Natasha; Leaf, Rebecca K; Kello, Nina; Knight, Jason S; Laskin, Carl; Lee, Alfred I; Legault, Kimberly; Levine, Steve R; Levy, Roger A; Limper, Maarten; Lockshin, Michael D; Mayer-Pickel, Karoline; Musial, Jack; Meroni, Pier Luigi; Orsolini, Giovanni; Ortel, Thomas L; Pengo, Vittorio; Petri, Michelle; Pons-Estel, Guillermo; Gomez-Puerta, Jose A; Raimboug, Quentin; Roubey, Robert; Sanna, Giovanni; Seshan, Surya V; Sciascia, Savino; Tektonidou, Maria G; Tincani, Angela; Wahl, Denis; Willis, Rohan; Yelnik, Cecile; Zuily, Catherine; Guillemin, Francis; Costenbader, Karen; Erkan, Doruk
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1258.full.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.74 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.74 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1941190
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 71
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact