ObjectivesIn this large multicentre study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab intravenous versus subcutaneous (SC) in 109 Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicentre study in referral centres from France, Italy, Spain, Armenia, Israel, Japan, Tunisia and Russia regarding biological-targeted therapies in TAK, since January 2017 to September 2019.ResultsA total of 109 TAK patients received at least 3 months tocilizumab therapy and were included in this study. Among them, 91 and 18 patients received intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively. A complete response (NIH <2 with less than 7.5 mg/day of prednisone) at 6 months was evidenced in 69% of TAK patients, of whom 57 (70%) and 11 (69%) patients were on intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively (p=0.95). The factors associated with complete response to tocilizumab at 6 months in multivariate analysis, only age <30 years (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.12; p=0.027) and time between TAK diagnosis and tocilizumab initiation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36; p=0.034). During the median follow-up of 30.1 months (0.4; 105.8) and 10.8 (0.1; 46.4) (p<0.0001) in patients who received tocilizumab in intravenous and SC forms, respectively, the risk of relapse was significantly higher in TAK patients on SC tocilizumab (HR=2.55, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.02; p=0.033). The overall cumulative incidence of relapse at 12 months in TAK patients was at 13.7% (95% CI 7.6% to 21.5%), with 10.3% (95% CI 4.8% to 18.4%) for those on intravenous tocilizumab vs 30.9% (95% CI 10.5% to 54.2%) for patients receiving SC tocilizumab. Adverse events occurred in 14 (15%) patients on intravenous route and in 2 (11%) on SC tocilizumab.ConclusionIn this study, we confirm that tocilizumab is effective in TAK, with complete remission being achieving by 70% of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-refractory TAK patients at 6 months.

Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study

Sciascia, Savino;
2023-01-01

Abstract

ObjectivesIn this large multicentre study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab intravenous versus subcutaneous (SC) in 109 Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicentre study in referral centres from France, Italy, Spain, Armenia, Israel, Japan, Tunisia and Russia regarding biological-targeted therapies in TAK, since January 2017 to September 2019.ResultsA total of 109 TAK patients received at least 3 months tocilizumab therapy and were included in this study. Among them, 91 and 18 patients received intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively. A complete response (NIH <2 with less than 7.5 mg/day of prednisone) at 6 months was evidenced in 69% of TAK patients, of whom 57 (70%) and 11 (69%) patients were on intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively (p=0.95). The factors associated with complete response to tocilizumab at 6 months in multivariate analysis, only age <30 years (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.12; p=0.027) and time between TAK diagnosis and tocilizumab initiation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36; p=0.034). During the median follow-up of 30.1 months (0.4; 105.8) and 10.8 (0.1; 46.4) (p<0.0001) in patients who received tocilizumab in intravenous and SC forms, respectively, the risk of relapse was significantly higher in TAK patients on SC tocilizumab (HR=2.55, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.02; p=0.033). The overall cumulative incidence of relapse at 12 months in TAK patients was at 13.7% (95% CI 7.6% to 21.5%), with 10.3% (95% CI 4.8% to 18.4%) for those on intravenous tocilizumab vs 30.9% (95% CI 10.5% to 54.2%) for patients receiving SC tocilizumab. Adverse events occurred in 14 (15%) patients on intravenous route and in 2 (11%) on SC tocilizumab.ConclusionIn this study, we confirm that tocilizumab is effective in TAK, with complete remission being achieving by 70% of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-refractory TAK patients at 6 months.
2023
9
2
1
11
Autoimmune Diseases; Inflammation; Systemic vasculitis
Mekinian, Arsène; Biard, Lucie; Lorenzo, Dagna; Novikov, Pavel I; Salvarani, Carlo; Espitia, Olivier; Sciascia, Savino; Michaud, Martin; Lambert, Marc; Hernández-Rodríguez, José; Schleinitz, Nicolas; Awisat, Abid; Puechal, Xavier; Aouba, Achille; Munoz Pons, Helene; Smitienko, Ilya; Gaultier, Jean Baptiste; Edwige, Le Mouel; Benhamou, Ygal; Perlat, Antoinette; Jego, Patrick; Goulenok, Tiphaine; Sacre, Karim; Lioger, Bertrand; Hassold, Nolan; Broner, Jonathan; Dufrost, Virginie; Sené, Thomas; Seguier, Julie; Maurier, Francois; Berthier, Sabine; Belot, Alexandre; Frikha, Faten; Denis, Guillaume; Audemard-Verger, Alexandra; Koné-Paut, Isabelle; Humbert, Sebastien; Woaye-Hune, Pascal; Tomelleri, Alessandro; Baldissera, Elena Marina; Kuwana, Masataka; Lo Gullo, Alberto; Mukuchyan, Vahan; Dellal, Azeddine; Gaches, Francis; Zeminsky, Pierre; Galli, Elena; Alvarado, Moya; Boiardi, Luigi; Muratore, Francesco; Vautier, Mathieu; Campochiaro, Corrado; Moiseev, Sergey; Vieira, Matheus; Cacoub, Patrice; Fain, Olivier; Saadoun, David
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
rmdopen-2022-002830.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 811.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
811.45 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1943893
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact