At the end of his treatise On Piety, Philodemus systematically criticizes Stoic theology, employing an excursus on Diagoras as part of his critique. Arguing against Diagoras’ detractors, Philodemus, relying on a testimonium by Aristoxenus, claims that in his poetic writings Diagoras did not commit any act of impiety. On the contrary, he argues that despite their practice of calling the gods by name in their treatises, the Stoics ended up destroying the gods more radically than ‘atheists’ like Philippus and others. The paper attempts to shed new light on this Herculanean testimonium to Diagoras and, above all, suggests a possible solution for identifying the otherwise unknown figure of Philippus ‘the Atheist.’
Diagoras and Philippus ‘the Atheist’ in Philodemus’ On Piety: A Suggestion
Christian Vassallo
2022-01-01
Abstract
At the end of his treatise On Piety, Philodemus systematically criticizes Stoic theology, employing an excursus on Diagoras as part of his critique. Arguing against Diagoras’ detractors, Philodemus, relying on a testimonium by Aristoxenus, claims that in his poetic writings Diagoras did not commit any act of impiety. On the contrary, he argues that despite their practice of calling the gods by name in their treatises, the Stoics ended up destroying the gods more radically than ‘atheists’ like Philippus and others. The paper attempts to shed new light on this Herculanean testimonium to Diagoras and, above all, suggests a possible solution for identifying the otherwise unknown figure of Philippus ‘the Atheist.’File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Mnemosyne, 75 (2022) 252-263.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
1.59 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.