In Aëtius 1.7.8 Mansfeld–Runia, Diogenes, Cleanthes, and Oenopides are said to have maintained that the deity is the world-soul. However, the identity of the Diogenes whom the doxographer mentions here has long been a matter of scholarly dispute. In response to attempts to ascribe the doxa to Diogenes of Apollonia, this paper reassesses old arguments and proposes new considerations to argue that a fundamental aspect of Diogenes of Babylon’s theology is at stake here.

Diogenes of Babylon on Who the Deity Is: Aëtius 1.7.8 Mansfeld-Runia Reconsidered

Christian Vassallo
2022-01-01

Abstract

In Aëtius 1.7.8 Mansfeld–Runia, Diogenes, Cleanthes, and Oenopides are said to have maintained that the deity is the world-soul. However, the identity of the Diogenes whom the doxographer mentions here has long been a matter of scholarly dispute. In response to attempts to ascribe the doxa to Diogenes of Apollonia, this paper reassesses old arguments and proposes new considerations to argue that a fundamental aspect of Diogenes of Babylon’s theology is at stake here.
2022
72
755
763
Aëtius; Diogenes of Apollonia; Diogenes of Babylon; Doxography; Herculaneum Papyri; Stoic Theology
Christian Vassallo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The Classical Quarterly, 72 (2022) 755-763.pdf

Accesso aperto

Dimensione 159.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
159.15 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1943936
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact