This article focuses on the hypothesis of a possible second version of the homily In mulieres unguentiferas (PG 88, cc. 1848-1866) by Gregory of Antioch (571-593). An important case of textual omission is here analyzed (PG 88, c. 1849, ll. 11-22), while the discussion of numerous other cases is postponed to subsequent papers. The hypothesis is that Patriarch Anastasius (559-570; 593-598) intervened to modify his predecessor’s homily to remove all possible traces of Christology that did not conform to his thoughts (aphthartodocetism, miaphysitism and outdated Christology of Ephrem of Antioch, which survived in Gregory’s homily).

Una presunta seconda redazione dell’omelia In mulieres unguentiferas di Gregorio di Antiochia

Rocco Schembra
2023-01-01

Abstract

This article focuses on the hypothesis of a possible second version of the homily In mulieres unguentiferas (PG 88, cc. 1848-1866) by Gregory of Antioch (571-593). An important case of textual omission is here analyzed (PG 88, c. 1849, ll. 11-22), while the discussion of numerous other cases is postponed to subsequent papers. The hypothesis is that Patriarch Anastasius (559-570; 593-598) intervened to modify his predecessor’s homily to remove all possible traces of Christology that did not conform to his thoughts (aphthartodocetism, miaphysitism and outdated Christology of Ephrem of Antioch, which survived in Gregory’s homily).
2023
13
169
182
Gregorio di Antiochia, omelia, mirofore, seconda redazione, manoscritto Grottaferrata
Rocco Schembra
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1945670
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact